Laserfiche WebLink
5.1. <br />Public Works Committee <br />Meeting Date: 02/17/2026 <br />Primary Strategic Plan Initiative: Not Applicable <br />Title: <br />Consider Recommending City Council Approval of MnDOT Limited Use Permit #0200-0113 <br />Purpose/Background: <br />Purpose: <br />The purpose of this case is to consider recommending City Council approval of MnDOT Limited Use Permit <br />#0200-0113. <br />Background: <br />The City of Ramsey is currently party to three (3) separate Limited Use Permits (LUP's) with the Minnesota <br />Department of Transportation (MnDOT) that allow the city to occupy certain segments of State-owned right-of- <br />way along Trunk Highways 10 and 47 for the purpose of operating and maintaining city -owned pedestrian trails <br />based on certain conditions specified within each permit. <br />The 3 existing LUP's include; <br />LUP #0202-0030 issued 5/18/2016 for trail segments south of Trunk Highway 10 <br />LUP #0206-018 issued 9/06/2005 for trail crossing under Trunk Highway 47 at Elmcrest Park <br />LUP #0206-0028 issued 3/07/2017 for trail segments east of Trunk Highway 47 generally south of a <br />point 900-feet north of Xkimo Street <br />During discussions with MnDOT concerning their proposed 2028 mill and overlay project, MnDOT informed <br />staff they wanted to replace the three existing LUP's with a new city-wide LUP to minimize administrative <br />efforts in the future. City staff agree this would benefit both parties moving forward. <br />Attached is a draft copy of city-wide LUP #0200-0113. Also attached are copies of the three existing LUP's. <br />Following Committee recommendation for City Council approval of LUP #0200-0113, staff will request City <br />Council approval of LUP #0200-0113 via Resolution. <br />Time Frame/Observations/Alternatives: <br />Observations: <br />City staff reviewed attached LUP #0200-0113 and submitted minimal comments to MnDOT, which were also <br />shared with the City Attorney. The City Attorney generally agreed with staff's comments and approved the <br />permit document as to legal form, but asked if the permit could be executed without a termination date. Staff is <br />currently checking with MnDOT to see if they are open to this. <br />The conditions of the new city-wide permit do not require the city to assume additional maintenance or <br />operational responsibilities. <br />Alternatives: <br />Alternative No. 1: Motion recommending City Council approval of MnDOT Limited Use Permit #0200- <br />0113. <br />Alternative No. 2: Motion of other. <br />