My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council - 01/27/2026
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council
>
2026
>
Minutes - Council - 01/27/2026
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/18/2026 2:56:53 PM
Creation date
2/18/2026 2:56:51 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
01/27/2026
Supplemental fields
Year
%(Da
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />believe a single strategically placed sign could substantially reduce complaints and improve the <br />quality of life for nearby residents. <br /> <br />Councilmember Riley thanked Police Chief Bluml for his work on the proposed amendment to the <br />nuisance noise ordinance and expressed strong support for the change. He noted that he was the <br />Councilmember who received a complaint about engine brake noise and emphasized that the <br />concern affected the entire neighborhood, not just a single resident. <br /> <br />Councilmember Riley stated that residents asked how many complaints were required for the issue <br />to be taken seriously, and he reassured them that a single complaint was sufficient to warrant <br />action. He agreed that the issue was limited to a specific section of roadway rather than a citywide <br />problem and supported installing a single sign to address the concern. He acknowledged that while <br />the solution seems simple, formal action, including an ordinance amendment, is necessary to <br />proceed appropriately, and reiterated his full support for moving forward with the change. <br /> <br />Mayor Heineman asked how the proposed engine-brake noise ordinance would be enforced in <br />practice, particularly in situations where multiple semi-trucks are traveling together. He inquired <br />whether enforcement would rely on an officer’s best determination of which vehicle emitted the <br />noise, similar to how MnDOT enforces commercial vehicle regulations, with officers stopping the <br />suspected vehicle to issue a warning or citation. <br /> <br />Police Chief Bluml explained that enforcement would be based on an officer’s direct observation, <br />meaning an officer would need to see and hear the engine braking coming from a specific vehicle <br />before initiating a traffic stop. He stated that the department’s primary goal would be education, <br />though citations may be used for repeat violations if necessary to change behavior. <br /> <br />Police Chief Bluml added that the Police Department can also partner with the State Patrol’s <br />Commercial Vehicle Enforcement Division. If a traffic stop reveals additional concerns, such as <br />unsafe equipment or other violations, officers may request a commercial vehicle inspector or direct <br />the vehicle to the nearby weigh scales in Ramsey for further inspection. <br /> <br />Mayor Heineman stated that the proposed enforcement approach sounded sufficient and expressed <br />confidence that education would be effective. Drawing on his own work experience, he noted that <br />once individuals are aware of the law, they generally adjust their behavior, at least in the affected <br />area, and often help spread awareness to others. He voiced his support for the ordinance <br />amendment, stating he believes it will be effective in reducing the issue. <br /> <br />Councilmember Buscher asked whether limiting the use of engine retarding brakes could impact <br />the safety of truck drivers or surrounding vehicles, expressing concern about the potential safety <br />implications of the proposed ordinance amendment. <br /> <br />Police Chief Bluml acknowledged that engine retarding brakes have legitimate safety and <br />operational benefits, including reducing wear and tear on braking systems. He explained that the <br />proposed ordinance seeks to balance safety and business needs with residents' quality-of-life <br />concerns, allowing engine brake use in emergencies while limiting non-essential use that causes <br />excessive noise. <br />City Council /January 27, 2026 <br />Page 8 of 10 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.