Laserfiche WebLink
related to our lot and the Northfork development. The lot has a unique shape and size requiring a City <br />variance. The Applicant would like to put up a detached garage on their property. The property lines <br />behind their home do not allow a suitable space for any building or structure. To the east behind the home <br />is their drain field. Beyond the drain field is low and marshy wetland with a culvert that drains from the <br />street. Directly next to our current garage is our well. <br />The proposed garage will also not alter the essential character of our property and neighborhood as several <br />homes have received similar variance approvals over the years. <br />The Applicant has provided site and building plans that show the location of the existing house, shed, driveway, <br />well, septic system, and drainfield, as well as the location and design of the proposed garage. Based on the lot's <br />layout, the location of the septic system north of the house and east of the attached garage, the location of the well <br />west of the attached garage, and the steep slope of the property that would need to be built upon to meet zoning <br />code requirements, the proposed detached garage could not be placed behind the front (north) edge of the house <br />and attached garage, thus proving the need for a Variance. Additionally, if the garage were to be shifted farther <br />south, it would encroach onto the existing driveway and the drainage and utility easement along the west <br />boundary of the property. The Applicant has selected the proposed location to limit the extension of the existing <br />driveway, limit the amount of dirt to be excavated, filled, and/or regraded, and reduce the visual impact to the <br />neighborhood along 160th Lane NW. The proposed location will maintain a minimum of 10 feet separation from <br />the house and attached garage to limit any code requirements for fire separation. The garage will be built into the <br />existing hill along the west side of the Applicant's driveway, thus limiting the impact to stormwater flow and <br />utilizing the topography and trees to screen the garage from the right-of-way. A few trees will be removed to <br />accommodate the garage, but there are ample trees remaining to provide screening of the garage. These <br />conditions will allow the garage to fit well within the neighborhood. It should be noted that several other <br />properties in the Northfork neighborhood have detached garages in the front yard. Additionally, the Northfork <br />Homeowner's Association has approved the design and placement of the proposed garage. <br />To make the garage fit with the character of the neighborhood and to meet the HOA requirements, the Applicant <br />is proposing to have the garage door face east (toward the driveway instead of the street). Additionally, all <br />exposed sides of the garage not covered by the side of the hill will have the same horizontal lap siding and brick <br />veneer matching the front facade of the existing house. Staff is supportive of these proposed architectural <br />treatments. <br />With all of the above information, Staff find the practical difficulties listed above to satisfy the following items <br />within the definition of practical difficulties, as defined by City Code: <br />That the property owner proposes to use the property in a reasonable manner not permitted by the zoning <br />code; <br />1. <br />The plight of the landowner is due to circumstances unique to the property not created by the landowner;2. <br />The variance, if granted, will not alter the essential character of the locality;3. <br />Economic considerations alone do not constitute practical difficulties.4. <br />Alternatives <br />Recommend approval of the Variance to the front yard placement for the accessory structure as requested <br />by the Applicant and recommended by staff. <br />1. <br />Recommend approval of the Variance with any additional reasonable conditions that mitigate any perceived <br />impacts of the Variance to the neighborhood. <br />2. <br />Recommend denial of the Variance based on specific findings.3. <br />Funding Source: <br />All costs associated with this request are the Applicant's responsibility. <br />Recommendation: <br />Staff recommends approval of the Variance. <br />Outcome/Action: