Minutes - Council - 02/10/2026 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Josh Clark, owner of the two properties under consideration, thanked city staff for their presentations and explanations of the conditional use permit process. He also expressed appreciation for the Ramsey Police Department, noting positive and supportive interactions over the years as a property owner in the city. Mr. Clark explained that the properties have traditionally been used for warehousing, such as storage for contractors and related businesses. He stated that the purpose of the conditional use permit request is to provide flexibility to rent space to motor-vehicle repair users in the future, potentially. He noted that, under the current city code, even limited vehicle work, such as a contractor working on their own work vehicle, would require a conditional use permit. He clarified that the request is speculative and intended to allow future tenants, such as small-scale or startup auto-repair operators, to work indoors in a commercial setting rather than from residential locations. He emphasized that there would be no customer waiting areas, no significant increase in on-site traffic, and no large number of occupants, as vehicles would be brought in solely for repair work. Mr. Clark stated that the conditional use permit process can take significant time, and that prospective tenants often need space quickly. By seeking approval in advance, he aims to make the properties more competitive and viable for future tenants who might otherwise choose another location if approval were uncertain or delayed. Councilmember Riley asked Planning staff to clarify whether approval of the conditional use permit (CUP) would still require additional work to comply with building and fire codes. He noted that the language in the case materials was somewhat unclear and sought confirmation that additional permitting or code-compliance steps would be required even if the CUP is approved. City Planner Martin confirmed that approval of the conditional use permits does not eliminate the need for additional work to meet building and fire code requirements. He explained that the applicant has been working with the City’s building official and fire marshal to identify the specific improvements required if a motor-vehicle repair use proceeds. He stated that architectural code analyses have already been prepared to determine what upgrades or modifications would be necessary to accommodate such uses. These requirements must still be completed before occupancy and operation. City Planner Martin confirmed that the limitations and requirements related to building and fire code compliance are intended to be included as conditions within the conditional use permit resolutions. Motion by Councilmember Buscher, seconded by Councilmember Specht, to adopt Resolution #26-024, Approving a Conditional Use Permit for Motor Vehicle Repair at 14310 Sunfish Lake Boulevard NW, subject to the conditions specified within the Resolution. Councilmember Peters expressed appreciation to the applicant for being proactive in seeking approval for a conditional use permit in advance. He noted that this approach helps prevent potential issues such as improperly stored or damaged vehicles and reduces the need for reactive enforcement by city staff. City Council /February 10, 2026 Page 17 of 20