My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 01/23/2007
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2007
>
Agenda - Council - 01/23/2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 9:58:51 AM
Creation date
1/19/2007 3:21:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
01/23/2007
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
395
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Mr. Rick Aberle, 17290 Germanium Street, requested an explanation of what is being discussed <br />tonight. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Geisler explained the cluster ordinance was passed a couple years ago. That <br />ordinance allowed property owners to take the permitted density at the time and put those houses <br />on smaller lots in a portion of the property, leaving the remainder of the property open for a time. <br />When those cluster standards were put in place there was quite a bit of concern, which is why the <br />Council put the moratorium on, in order to take another look at the cluster ordinance. When the <br />moratorium was put in place there was concern about imp . t luster ordinance to make it <br />a better ordinance. As the Council was reviewing the or ere concerned there was <br />not enough information to effectively amend the r hat is the reason for the <br />interim Comprehensive Plan amendment with 0 il they get to the 2008 <br />Comprehensive Plan date. <br /> <br /> <br />Mr. Aberle asked how this affects a 2 Yz acre lot. <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt explained this will no <br />someone that owns an undeveloped tra <br />acre tract of land could currently sub <br />only develop it as one parcel. <br /> <br />wns a 2 Y2 acre lot. It may impact <br />es. Someone that owns a 10 <br />this goes forward they could <br /> <br />Mr. AberIe asked how this <br />that may want to purchase <br /> <br />joins a possible future development <br />ent. <br /> <br />Chairperson <br />have les <br />neede. <br /> <br />. 0 would be interested in acquiring the property would <br />act because three more similar parcels would be <br /> <br />enue NW, questioned if this change will basically put 75% of <br />ceo <br /> <br />eplied the Rural Developing Area being discussed is north of the <br />MUSA line. There are couple other rural districts north of the MUSA line. The Central Rural <br />Reserve Area and the Rural Preserve Area are not being discussed at this time. Basically tonight <br />they are talking about everything north of the MUSA outside of these two areas. <br /> <br />Planning Commission/January 4, 2007 <br />Page 18 of 36 <br /> <br />-259- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.