My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 01/23/2007
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2007
>
Agenda - Council - 01/23/2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 9:58:51 AM
Creation date
1/19/2007 3:21:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
01/23/2007
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
395
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Mr. Merlyn Hunt stated he has no objection to having parks if someone buys his property. It is <br />confiscation that is happening and it is not right. <br /> <br />Mr. Harvey Wibeto, 9020 173rd Avenue, stated he owns 10 acres and would like to develop it. <br />He asked how big of a lot is needed for a well and a septic system. He suggested whatever that <br />size requirement is to have a well and septic system should be the limit as to how small a lot <br />should be. If that size is 2 ~ acres it would eliminate clusters. <br /> <br /> <br />Associate Planner Da1nes indicated 1 acre is required for <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt noted 2 ~ acres would exceed <br />this area should be what the state law would al <br />beyond the 2 Y2 acres being contemplated. <br /> <br />To say the minimum for <br />II and septic would go <br /> <br />Ms. Jean Jackson indicated the notice that was <br />will consider an amendment to the R -1 Rural Dev <br />would discontinue the use of cluster deve10pmen <br />only standard that would be changed is densi <br />concept. <br /> <br />ommission <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt explained they are 10 <br />either going back to 1 in 2 ~ acres or 1 <br /> <br />Mr. Frank Becker, 15921 Ebon <br />water coming to any part of thi <br /> <br />s would be changed by sewer and <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt replied <br />recoup the dollars spent to <br /> <br />from sewer and water passing through a MUSA <br /> <br />ity would need to increase to make it feasible, and there is <br />r that. The landowner would apply for a zoning amendment <br />t as a condition of getting the MUSA. <br /> <br />Mr. Be <br />reference to <br />or by a develop <br />a 1 acre lot, but liv <br />off the other half of his <br />that ability to change. <br /> <br />is not so much with applying for sewer and water, it is in <br />e area. Whether it is a result of something a landowner initiated <br />pass through provides an opportunity to connect to it. He lives on <br />of that so that if sewer and water were to come through he could sell <br />t to offset the cost of hooking up to sewer and water. He does not want <br /> <br />Planning Commission/January 4, 2007 <br />Page 24 of 36 <br /> <br />-265- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.