Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Chairperson Nixt observed staff has done a good job of pointing out the issues. He noted <br />Council has discussed options and concerns have been expressed regarding going back to 2 ~ <br />acre lots. He requested information regarding what those concerns are. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Geisler replied concerns have been expressed regarding infrastructure and that <br />by allowing 2 ~ acre development they will be limiting options for future development. <br /> <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt questioned how the infrastructure issue <br />2008 when the Comprehensive Plan would come into play <br /> <br />Associate Planner Geisler replied 2 ~ acre de <br />Comprehensive Plan. The residents will be <br />understanding of the Council's direction is to <br />rural area. There will be more public input an <br />certainty for what they can do with their property i <br /> <br />k as part of the 2008 <br />cess. Her <br />ook at the <br />vided with <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt stated the problem he has with 40 in 40/1 <br />that the City has to deal with infrastruc He does <br />problems between now and the 2008 Co <br />not addressing the reality they have as <br />City's obligations are. <br /> <br />Commissioner Van Scoy observ <br />in 10, basically to put a morato <br />there is an issue with 2 ~ ac <br />lots relates to what they <br />expansion and planning 0 <br />people maki !rying t1i <br />swung other. <br />ref ere it is 1 <br /> <br />was given to go back to 4 in 40/1 <br />smaller lots, and the concept is that <br />on of the concern regarding 2 ~ acre <br />with the c rdinance with the difficulty for future <br />borhoods. His concern is going from 2 ~ acre lots with <br />. ance, and now going to 1 in 10. The pendulum has <br />that also concerns him is that he does not see any <br />Yz acres. He asked if ghost platting is part of the <br /> <br />section of the City Code requests developers to prepare a re- <br /> <br />Chairp 011 in 10 may have a counter productive effect in that if you <br />allow subdl arcel into four 10 acre parcels and each of those are developed, <br />you then have housing inventory 40 acres to accommodate 4 houses that may at <br />most accommodat an 50% of its theoretic possibility because of how it has been <br />developed. He does n . think this will really have accomplished planning. Given the current <br />state of the housing market, and the fact that they will not solve many of the concerns, he <br />believes that economics will dictate how developable this section of the City is with 2 ~ acre <br />lots. The City needs to have its feet held to the fire to get on with effective planning. The 4 in 40 <br />may actually hurt the City. If the City feels their performance standards in 2 Y2 acres is lacking, <br /> <br />Planning Commission/January 4,2007 <br />Page 26 of 36 <br /> <br />-267- <br />