Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Commissioner Trites Rolle asked if the site in question is one that has not been inspected yet. <br /> <br />Assistant Community Development Director Fro1ik replied staff has not gone into the <br />Employment District with inspections, which is where the site is located. Staffs focus at this <br />time is on the Highway 10 corridor. <br /> <br />Commissioner Hunt indicated he would have a problem forcing someone to pave something on a <br />property that is for sale without an idea of what the future e. He would think. of that <br />as an unreasonable request. <br /> <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt asked if the surface would ne <br />the property to have outside ~torage. <br /> <br />Assistant Community Development Director Fro <br />be redeveloped and the paving would then be ins <br /> <br />operty will <br /> <br />rdinance that applies to <br />iance measures, for a <br /> <br />Assistant Community Develop <br />with a special request to be <br />point the City has the oppo <br /> <br />. s property has come forward <br />roperties. She questioned at what <br />requiring site improvements. <br /> <br />olik replied this site was developed prior to the <br /> <br />andfathering exception. <br /> <br />Director Frolik replied her understanding is the courts have <br />t be grandfathered in; only uses can. <br /> <br />Chairperson Nl <br />interim use permit. <br /> <br />hat is unique about this site that provides the rationale to grant the <br /> <br />Assistant Community Development Director Frolik replied the request is being made to add <br />another user on the property. This gives the City the opportunity to start requiring compliance <br />with the performance standards. Without the new user the property could likely continue with <br />class 5 until the site redevelops. <br /> <br />Planning Commission/January 4, 2007 <br />Page 14 of36 <br /> <br />-297- <br />