My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 01/23/2007
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2007
>
Agenda - Council - 01/23/2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 9:58:51 AM
Creation date
1/19/2007 3:21:30 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
01/23/2007
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
395
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Associate Planner Dalnes replied very few. The only other option would be on the north side. <br />The geothermal field takes up about ~ of the property, and the parking lot takes up another good <br />portion. There are also the secondary and primary septic system sites. In working with the <br />Engineering Department this location was determined based on the setbacks and the Fire Chief s <br />request for a future storage facility. <br /> <br />Commissioner Van Scoy asked the applicant to address the safety concerns of a 10 foot setback. <br /> <br /> <br />Mr. Steven Edwards, representative of T-Mobile indicate <br />He has never heard of a monopole failing, but if they do <br />themselves. The top of the tower, which will co e <br />the wind. If anything below were to fail, the st at <br />itself; it would not create a situation where steel <br /> <br />ole is a very safe design. <br />esigned to collapse onto <br />. 1 receive the majority of <br />sentially collapse onto <br /> <br />Commissioner Van Scoy asked if it is standard in <br />the property line. <br /> <br />de. There are instances <br />ilding. <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt questioned if there is <br />DaInes replied not directly adjacent. <br /> <br />2 times the tower in a residential <br />ss district is not motivated towards <br />each district. So it primarily goes to <br />an Scoy's concerns, given the lack of <br />e10pment there will be an opportunity to design the <br />er that would accommodate the existing tower or <br />Comprehensive Land Use Plan for 2008, the land <br />developed may undergo changes. Given those <br />a safety e, he would move away from that as a motivating <br />courage staff to work with the applicant to find out how much <br />odate the City's interest in preserving space for the future <br />g aesthetic and other concerns related to the placement of <br />future residential development. <br /> <br />Civil Engin <br />meet the conce <br />tower internal to <br />north property line tha <br /> <br />d staff is working on evaluating the site plan to better define and <br />preserve space for the Fire Station future needs, and yet keep this <br />much as possible. He noted there is a large stand of trees along the <br />11 screen and buffer the site. <br /> <br />Commissioner Trites Rolle commented there will also be a landscaping plan. The City has <br />somewhat created this issue by its need for the land where the tower is currently located, and it <br />sounds that all the other options have been exhausted in the area. <br /> <br />-330- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.