My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 02/01/2007
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2007
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 02/01/2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 9:41:19 AM
Creation date
1/26/2007 10:21:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
02/01/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
130
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />ASK THE AUTHOR JOIN US ONLINE! <br /> <br />About the Author <br />Lisa Nisenson is a principal at Nisenson Consulting, <br />She is also working with Tetratech to develop <br />stormwater program guidance for the U,S, Environ- <br />mental Protection Agency's Office of Water, Nisenson <br />has worked Oil smart growth at the national and local <br />levels for nearly 15 years, <br /> <br />Go online from December 18 to 29 to participate in our "Ask the Author" forum, an inter- <br />active feature of Zoning Practice, Lisa Nisenson will be available to answer questions <br />about this article, Go to the APA website at www,planning,organd follow the links to the <br />Ask the Author section, From there, just submit your questions about the article using an <br />e-mail linlc. The authors will reply, and Zoning Practice will post the answers cumulatively <br />on the website for the benefit of all subscribers, This feature will be available for <br />selected issues of Zoning Practice at announced times, After each online discussion is <br />closed, the answers will be saved in an online archive available through the APA Zoning <br />Practice web pages, <br /> <br />conveyance system as quickly as possible. The <br />approach kept basements and foundations dry <br />but proved catastrophic for local streams that <br />suffered the impact of collective polluted flow <br />from houses, offices, and parking lots. <br />The damage to streams is more than an <br />environmental misfortune. The flow collected from <br />acres of concrete scours riverbanks and creates <br />mud deposits, making streams wider and shal- <br />lower. The altered water flow poses challenges to <br />floodplain managers, water supply companies, <br />and industries that rely on clean, steady flows. <br />The primary reason for the problem is the location <br />and extent of land development, and the most <br />common indicator is impervious cover-rooftops, <br />parking lots, and roads, and even compacted dirt, <br />gravel, and grassy surfaces. <br /> <br />WHAT DRIVES IMPERVIOUS SURFACE? <br />Watershed managers and land developers <br />cannot manage the impacts of excess impeNi- <br />ous surface without first understanding the <br />reasons for its proliferation. Planning and zon- <br />ing officials regularly make decisions about <br />impeNious cover with respect to: <br /> <br />· Parking. Minimum parking standards and <br />cautious lending practices can lead to unnec- <br />essarily large parking lots. <br />· Site design. Site design parameters have <br />increased with setbacks and minimum lot size <br />requirements (partially to accommodate more <br />parking) and maximum height limitations that <br />force development outward to meet demand. <br />Even where codes allow'multistory development, <br />parking requirements based on square footage <br />ultimately dictate less intensity. <br />· Street design and mode choice. Uncon- <br />nected, hierarchical street designs often result <br />in dispersed development and an increase in <br />impeNious surface, leading to poor trans- <br />portation choices. Street design also influ- <br />ences mode choice. In places where trips for <br /> <br />daily needs cannot be made without a car, <br />businesses will argue that they need gener- <br />ous parking allotments. <br />· Separation of uses. The Euclidean model of <br />separating uses can make walking or combin- <br />ing trips impractical, if not impossible. When <br />businesses and services are spread out, more <br />impervious surfaces are created and people <br />are beholden to vehicular travel. <br />· Redevelopment. Redevelopment is among <br />the best (yet least recognized) watershed pro- <br />tection strategies. By contrast, vacating an <br />urban site to relocate at the basin's edge ulti- <br />mately means the watershed is burdened <br />with runoff from two sites. <br />· Infill. Infi.ll development was listed in the <br />1999 notice as a viable strategy for reducing <br />stormwater impacts. This was mostly true. <br />However, planners must track absorbent <br />spaces that are poised for development and <br />balance flows accordingly. <br />. New stormwaterrequirements. Some ofthe <br />emerging BMPs require that large portions of <br />a site remain undeveloped (though not nec- <br />essarily undisturbed). Be careful. The result <br /> <br />can favor developers who assemble a parcel <br />large enough to accommodate 200,000 <br />square feet of floorplate. 800 parking spaces, <br />drive aisles, and service bays, plus the calcu- <br />lated land' set-aside. Such requirements tend <br />to exacerbate sprawl and impeNious cover <br />because big enough parcels can only be <br />found in the outlying areas and require the <br />expansion of roads and other infrastructure. <br /> <br />THE ROLE OF PlANNING AND ZONING <br />Planning and zoning departments can have a <br />big impact on the development and mainte- <br />nance of stormwater management plans. The <br />question is where to start. <br />First, establish which federal and state <br />stormwater rules apply, in particular, for post- <br />construction. Among the first questions to ask <br />are (1) What water quality problems exist <br />today? and (2) What ~re the anticipated prob- <br />lems in the watershed?The type and nature of <br />water stressors invariably influence planning <br />needs. Also, obtain copies of the comprehen- <br />sive plan and watershed plan. A strong compre- <br />hensive plan is the initial and most important <br />BMP to put into place. Applying BMPs in an ad <br />hoc ~anner will not protect against stream <br />degradation and flooding in the long term. <br />Ignoring a land-use pattem that creates excess <br />imperviousness will only delay the inevitable <br />costs of stream restoration and flood clean-up <br />that site-specific BMPs cannot control. <br /> <br /> <br />ZONING PRACTICE 11.06 <br />AMERICAN PlANNING ASSOCIATION I P'4es <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.