My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 02/01/2007
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2007
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 02/01/2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 9:41:19 AM
Creation date
1/26/2007 10:21:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
02/01/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
130
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />New York City took a similar approach in <br />the comprehensive rezon.ing of Green point- <br />Williamsburg in May 2005. As described by <br />the city, the rezoning "sets the stage for the <br />renewal of a vacant and underutilized stretch <br />of the Brooklyn waterfront. . . . It reclaims two <br />miles of long-neglected East River waterfront <br />to create over 50 acres of open space, includ- <br />ing a continuous public esplanade and a new <br />28-acre park surrounding the Bushwick Inlet. <br />The plan creates new opportunities for thou- <br />sands of units of much-needed housing, <br />including affordable hou.sing, within a <br />detailed urban design plan that addresses the <br />scale ofthe existing neighborhoods." <br />The zoning plan includes a voluntary <br />inclusionary housing program that provides <br /> <br />To yield meaningful benefits for home af- <br />ford ability, such strategies generally need to be <br />implemented either on a broad enough scale to <br />significantly increase the supply of homes or in <br />a manner designed specifically to lead to the <br />production of additional affordable homes, <br />such as through inclusionary zoning require- <br />ments or incentives. The latter approach is dis- <br />cussed later in this article. <br />Zoning for a variety of housing types. <br />Many communities have zoning policies that <br />either directly restrict or have the effect of <br />restricting (for example, through infeasible park- <br />ing requirements) the construction of new multi- <br />family homes. manufactured homes. or acces- <br />sory dwelling units. Because each of these <br />housing types can be used to construct homes <br /> <br /> <br />a density bonus and tax abatements to <br />developers that agree to certain affordability <br />restrictions. Initial reports show a strong <br />take-up of these incentives. According to <br />Mayor Bloomberg's June 26, 2006, press <br />release. "The plan will spur 10,800 new <br />units of mqch-needed housing, and through, <br />a powerful combination of zoning incen- <br />tives, housing programs, and city-owned <br />land, 3,500 ofthose units will be affordable. <br />One year after the rezoning was enacted <br />there are already 1,000 affordable units in <br />the pipeline for near-term construction on <br />the waterfront alone. That's 64 percent of <br />the rezoning estimate of 1,563 affordable <br />units on the waterfront." <br /> <br />that are less expensive than detached, single- <br />family homes, such policies tend to make <br />homes more expensive for working families. <br />On the other hand, by adopting zQning <br />policies that maximize the availability of <br />these housing types, communities can both <br />expand the supply of affordable homes and <br />meet a wider range of their constituents' <br />needs. <br />In recent years, tremendous advances <br />have been made in the design of both multi- <br />family and manufactured homes. When well <br />designed, both types are of extremely high <br />quality and fit in well into the community. <br />Multifamily homes can add value to commu- <br />nities by helping to revitalize distressed <br /> <br />neighborhoods, increasing the ridership for <br />public transit, and providing homes for <br />working families near where they work-cut- <br />ting down on traffic congestion and improv- <br />ing job retention. Many of the higher-end <br />manufactured homes can no longer be dis- <br />tinguished from stick-built homes, yet cost <br />thousands less. Finally, accessory dwellings- <br />smaller homes that are built next to or as <br />part of a principal home-can be an excel- <br />lent way to provide affordable homes for <br />parents or caretakers ofthe principal resi- <br />dents or to provide opportunities to expand <br />the supply of rental homes while generating <br />income for the owners. <br />Auburn Court, in Cambridge, <br />Massachusetts, is a good example of an <br />attractive mixed income development that <br />provides 137 homes in a multifamily setting <br />spread out along three garden courtyard <br />residential blocks. Established as part of <br />the larger University Park development on <br />land assembled by the Massachusetts <br />Institute ofTechnology, Auburn Court con- <br />sists of a mix of one-, two-, and three-bed. <br />room rental homes distributed among flats <br />and duplexes. Most buildings in the devel- <br />opment are three stories, though several <br />rise up to six stories to frame the entrance <br />to University Park. With half the homes <br />affordable to families with incomes below <br />50 percent of the area median, and other <br />homes either at market rate or affordable to <br />families at 90 percent of the area median <br />income. Auburn Court was featured as part <br />of a recent National Building Museum <br />exhibit on affordable homes. <br />Many people are familiar with the use of <br />manufactured homes in rural settings, but <br />Oakland Community Housing Inc. [California] <br />demonstrates that they also have a place in <br />the city. As part oftheir infill homeownership <br />initiative, they have produced both single- <br />family detached homes (the "En Street proj- <br />ect) and multistory town homes (the Linden <br />Terrace project). <br />Both Santa Rosa, California, and Mercer <br />Island, Washington, use accessory dwelling <br />units as a strategy for expanding the supply <br />of affordable homes. In Santa Rosa, accessory <br />dwelling units are typically incorporated into <br />new developments, such as Courtside Village. <br />a pedestrian-friendly mixed use development <br />that includes 100 ~ccessory units. In Mercer <br />Island, officials have streamlined the permit- <br />ting process and launched a public education <br /> <br />ZONING PRACTICE 12.06 <br />AMERICAN PLANNING ASSOCIATION I pa~ f:-"~'-' <br /> <br />i ../ <br />i" <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.