My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 02/01/2007
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2007
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 02/01/2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 9:41:19 AM
Creation date
1/26/2007 10:21:26 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
02/01/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
130
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />then that may be where they invest their infrastructure and resources to beef up the performance <br />standards in relation to access, safety issues and traffic. <br /> <br />Commissioner Levine observed a lot of people have been planning around the 2 ~ acres; to <br />change that now does not seem right and could be very counter productive in the long run. <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt stated he questions whether much will be gained with the 4 in 40, and whether <br />the immediate concerns could be addressed through an increase in performance standards related <br />to infrastructure and traffic issues. He noted there are some areas of the rural developing area <br />that will be more conducive to 2 ~ acre developments than others. Clustering is not working. <br /> <br />Commissioner Trites Rolle commented for clustering to work they would need to look at places <br />where it is successful, and it would need to be discussed through the Comprehensive Plan <br />process in great detail. <br /> <br />Commissioner VanScoy noted a lot of people have talked about looking at individual pieces of <br />land, and the PUD is a way of dealing with that. He agrees that they need to focus on stronger <br />standards and better planning with 2 ~ acre lots. That would be more effective than 1 in 10, <br />which is an extreme response to the issue. <br /> <br />Commissioner Levine concurred. <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt stressed that all housing types need to be made available in the City, including <br />townhouses, single family within the MUSA, and 2 ~ acre. This will enhance the community. <br /> <br />Motion by Chairperson Nixt, seconded by Commissioner VanScoy, to recommend denial of the <br />Comprehensive Plan Amendment. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Nixt, Commissioners VanScoy, Cleveland, Hunt, <br />Levine, and Trites Rolle. Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioner Brauer. <br /> <br />Motion by Chairperson Nixt, seconded by Commissioner Trites Rolle, to recommend that the <br />City Council adopt an ordinance to amend Chapter 9 (Zoning and Subdivision of Land) of the <br />Ramsey City Code to eliminate the performance standards applicable to the cluster ordinance and <br />to modify the ordinance as necessary to provide for a minimum of 1 house per 2 ~ acres in the <br />Rural Developing Area. <br /> <br />Further discussion: Commissioner VanScoy suggested the motion include a recommendation <br />for a ghost platting requirement for future development. Chairperson Nixt indicated he would <br />like to deal with the ghost platting as a separate item. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Nixt, Commissioners Trites Rolle, Cleveland, Hunt, <br />Levine, and Van Scoy. Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioner Brauer. <br /> <br />Planning Commission/January 4, 2007 <br />Page 27 of 36 <br /> <br />P27 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.