My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council Work Session - 01/16/2007
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council Work Session
>
2007
>
Minutes - Council Work Session - 01/16/2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 2:40:54 PM
Creation date
2/7/2007 2:31:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council Work Session
Document Date
01/16/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
10
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Consensus of the Council was to direct staff to amend the feasibility study to include this right- <br />of way purchase to be assessed back as a project cost, rather than a City cost. <br /> <br />Sanitary Sewer: All sanitary sewer cost will be assessed to the project. No utility trunk cost <br />will be expended. <br /> <br />Public Works Director Olson questioned if these property owners will receive a trunk benefit for <br />the extra depth from the trunk line through the project. He noted they will pay trunk fees, so <br />they should be credited for the additional amount they pay because the line is at an extra depth. <br /> <br />Mr. Femrite indicated Dave Martini (Bolton & Menk) eluded to the fact that the Comprehensive <br />Sanitary Sewer Plan shows the trunk line connecting to the existing sanitary sewer about mid <br />block and continuing south as being the main deep line. It does not necessarily spur on 157th; it <br />would need to be stubbed to continue to the south for a future connection. <br /> <br />Public Works Director Olson stated he would suggest that spur be utilized. <br /> <br />Watermain: The watermain on 157th Lane will be assessed as a project cost. There is a <br />significant amount of trunk watermain that would need to be installed which would be financed <br />by the utility. Two options have been identified: <br /> <br />(a) Option A Cost of$1,771,000 <br />· Would provide a second water source for all lots on 15ih Lane <br />· Expense is a part of the identified future trunk water system <br /> <br />(b) Option B Cost of $965,000 <br />· Would not provide a second water source to lots on 15ih Lane, but would eliminate <br />one mile dead end. <br />· Connection is dependent on the development of Sweet Bay Ridge <br /> <br />City Engineer Jankowski advised both the line along Ramsey Boulevard and the portion along <br />Sunfish Lake and Nowthen Boulevards are designed consistent with the current trunk system. <br />Sooner or later those lines will be needed in the size and location shown. The portion of the <br />trunk line that runs through the neighborhood is as a minimum size and may need to be <br />unexcavated when the sewer and water main goes to that area. To some extent a portion of <br />Option A is somewhat of a throwaway. Also the stub that goes from Ramsey Boulevard to <br />Sweet Bay Ridge goes through a wetland. it would not provide any future development to <br />property developing along it, but would continue to provide another avenue of water to increase <br />the reliability of the system. <br /> <br />Councilmember Elvig verified they will be stubbing off the end of the loop on Nowthen <br />Boulevard. He pointed out that part of the benefit of Sweet Bay Ridge is that it will create <br />another leg to another loop. He requested clarification that Option A would be temporary and <br />would be dug up in the future for sewer and water. He requested staff to address Option B. <br /> <br />City Council Work Session / January 16,2007 <br />Page 3 of 10 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.