Laserfiche WebLink
—105— <br />CITY,OF PkNISEY <br />• <br />Street tllaintenance Program Assessment Practices <br />(1) <br />cts are identified by individual subdivisions, or by grouping of subdivision <br />Prole histories and conditions and similar pavement <br />and lots having similar p avement <br />areas per benefited unit. <br />Q the total assessable cost of .. <br />(2) <br />An assessment share will be calculated by determining. <br />ofbenefited• units <br />the project and dividing by the number <br />3 <br />O <br />Where and individual lot has more than o eesatOtrvpe n imp =o n��Q�e lot- <br />th <br />scheduled to receive an improvement, or <br />benefited and be as share for the the main improvement <br />be w ay <br />will considered ot that contains <br />_.which is conducted along the fronta of th <br />opening- <br />assessed to benefited property 1O eer is <br />(4) <br />ealcoats and overlays the amount <br />Fors U overhead costs. <br />total t cost Lncluduig <br />50% of the projec <br />which have had previous proposed maintenance proj ects <br />if <br />(5) <br />p evolving streets ble to receive the City's 50% contribution, <br />defeated by petition Shall be ineligi <br />f for <br />• <br />ve mainten <br />P d a. <br />petition now arespr pose <br />the p requires a more expensi tti2 p <br />sealcoating pro a ro which was defeated by e <br />(199.3 <br />. <br />bituminous overlay) <br />e the assessable project cost by the number of benefited . <br />Where the rule of dividing whi ch is grossly out of <br />(6) <br />above) would result in an assessable share <br />uni ts '(no to similar lots receiving similar <br />o charged <br />proportions to the assessable share e bein <br />the City Council may elect to assess such lots the a�Jerage <br />for that <br />improvements, <br />sessable share being made to lots receiving similar i mproveme nts <br />as (1996).. <br />project year. <br />ere a benefited area contains commercial lots having varying sizes, the <br />Wh (Z00�) <br />(7) <br />shall be made based on area of the lot. - <br />assessment <br />Where an individual lot has more than one frontage including a driveway frontage <br />a MSA or city street, <br />g <br />() <br />n- driveway frontage <br />a state or county road, and ano e on <br />to the A or <br />on _City <br />assessment share will be made for an improvement <br />99 <br />( ) <br />one -Half <br />street. <br />dividual lot has. a single frontage on an MSA street, such lot w tollnon <br />Where an rovem <br />(9) <br />e of im <br />the average assessable shire for the typ P (1992) <br />assessed <br />VISA streets receiving that improvement. <br />Whenever po ssible townhouse units shall be aggregate u i ts must be combined ombined n <br />• (10) where townhous <br />Iii <br />having 3 S1Rale {and use. Instances <br />—105— <br />