Laserfiche WebLink
• <br />CASE # ( <br />CONSIDER ADOPTION OF AMENDMENTS TO THE R -1 RESIDENTIAL ZONING <br />DISTRICT: RURAL DEVELOPING AREA (CLUSTER ORDINANCE); <br />CASE OF CITY OF RAMSEY <br />By: Amy Geisler, AICP, Associate Planner <br />Background: <br />At the April 11, 2006 meeting the City Council adopted a 9- month moratorium on all subdivision <br />and platting in the R -1 Rural Developing District. The moratorium was recently extended an <br />additional 3 months. The purpose of the. moratorium s added to provide <br />he Rural Developing m <br />revisions to the cluster subdivision standards which re <br />early 2005. <br />The following items are enclosed for your information: <br />a) Rural Developing Area map exhibit <br />b) Draft City Council meeting minutes dated January 23, 2007 <br />c) Proposed R -1 Residential District Ordinance (2.5 -acre lot requirements) <br />Funding Source: <br />• <br />No funding required. <br />Notification: <br />The Planning Commission held a public hearing at their January 4, 2007 meeting. <br />Observations: <br />• <br />The Planning Commission held a public hearing on January 4, 2007 and recommended the City <br />Council adopt an ordinance to revert to 2.5 -acre lot requirements in the R -1 Residential: Rural <br />Developing Area. The Commission also recommended that the City Council consider additional <br />performance standards for Resubdivision Plans for new developments in the Rural Developing <br />Area. <br />Staff has included some additional criteria for Resubdivision Plans under Subd. 6 in the ordinance. <br />These criteria are based on what is currently in code under the cluster requirements and the Interim <br />Policy for Comprehensive Plan Amendments that the Council adopted in 2005. <br />At the January 23, 2007 meeting, the City Council rejected a 10 -acre minim lot standard <br />requirement (Zoning Ordinance Amendment and Comprehensive Plan Amendment) and <br />introduced an ordinance to revert to 2.5 -acre lot requirements, which were in place prior to the <br />adoption of the cluster ordinance. This ordinance is now eligible for adoption. <br />—169 — <br />