My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council - 05/12/2026
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council
>
2026
>
Minutes - Council - 05/12/2026
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/28/2026 8:24:55 AM
Creation date
5/28/2026 8:24:46 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
05/12/2026
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
15
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />the Council to consider the message sent to future generations, particularly young women, <br />about inclusion and participation in public life. She urged the Council to support symbols <br />that reflect the full community and promote equal dignity and representation for all <br />residents. <br /> <br />Mayor Heineman noted that former Councilmember Matt Woestehoff submitted written <br />comments to the Council regarding the flag discussion. He explained that Woestehoff <br />provided a lengthy statement outlining his views and suggested that interested residents <br />review the comments on Woestehoff’s blog rather than having the full statement read aloud <br />during the meeting. <br /> <br />Mr. Nick Steblay, 15460 Xkimo Street NW, addressed the Ramsey City Council, <br />expressing legal and financial concerns regarding proposed Resolutions 26-111 and 26- <br />108 involving investigations and potential censure actions related to Governor Tim Walz. <br />He argued that the City Charter limits the Council’s authority to municipal affairs and <br />contended that pursuing state-level political matters falls outside the city’s legal scope. He <br />also questioned whether the City had standing to pursue legal action connected to the <br />Feeding Our Future fraud case. He raised concerns about the use of City Staff time, legal <br />expenses, and budget allocations for the effort. He encouraged the Council to focus on local <br />services and allow state agencies and the Legislature to handle statewide fraud <br />investigations. <br /> <br />Mr. Duane Skoglund, 1100 70th Lane NW, addressed the Ramsey City Council regarding <br />the Minnesota state flag discussion. He criticized the adoption of the current state flag, <br />arguing that it did not reflect the values of many residents in the area. He expressed support <br />for councilmembers who favored removing the current flag and replacing it with the former <br />design. During his comments, he also referenced prior concerns he has raised about <br />meeting audio quality and indicated he has lived in the Anoka County area his entire life. <br /> <br />Ms. Teri Trail, 6025 Green Valley Road, addressed the Ramsey City Council regarding the <br />Minnesota state flag discussion. She spoke about Minnesota’s history, including Native <br />American heritage, European settlement, and the development of industries tied to the <br />State’s natural resources. She explained that she was born and raised in northern Minnesota <br />and identified herself as having Dakota ancestry. She criticized the process used to adopt <br />the new state flag, arguing that the decision was made by a small appointed group rather <br />than through a statewide public vote. She also described several elements of the former <br />Minnesota flag that she believed represented the State’s history and identity, including <br />agricultural imagery, Native American symbolism, and other historic references. <br /> <br />Ms. Christina Harper, 14180 Xenon Street NW, addressed the Ramsey City Council <br />regarding the Minnesota state flag discussion. She argued that returning to the former state <br />flag would be a mistake because the design had remained controversial and divisive for <br />decades, even after prior modifications. She explained that the 2023 redesign process <br />involved a 13-member commission, public input, and more than 2,000 submissions from <br />Minnesotans. She indicated the process was publicly discussed and not rushed. She also <br />noted that the former flag represented difficult aspects of Minnesota’s history and argued <br />City Council / May 12, 2026 <br />Page 4 of 15 <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.