Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Mr. Ron Trail, 6025 Green Valley Road NW, addressed the Ramsey City Council <br />regarding the Minnesota state flag discussion. He expressed frustration with the process <br />for adopting the new flag and argued that Minnesota residents should have been allowed <br />to vote directly on the design change. He also objected to reports that penalties could be <br />imposed on cities that refuse to display the new state flag, stating that residents should <br />determine what occurs within the City. <br /> <br />Mr. Trail further argued that removing imagery from the former flag, including Native <br />American representation and historic symbols tied to Minnesota’s development, erased <br />important parts of the State’s heritage and history. He maintained that the former flag had <br />represented Minnesota for many years and urged the Council to support displaying the <br />historic design rather than the current flag. <br /> <br />Mr. Michael Swanson, 5368 140th Court NW, Ramsey, addressed the Ramsey City <br />Council regarding the Minnesota state flag discussion. He argued that the former state seal <br />and flag symbolized the removal of Native Americans from Minnesota following the <br />Dakota War of 1862 and expressed support for the State’s decision to adopt a new flag <br />design. He also explained that while living outside Minnesota for several years, he found <br />that many people could not identify the former state flag because it resembled numerous <br />other state flags with dark blue backgrounds and detailed seals. He indicated the new <br />Minnesota flag has a more recognizable and distinctive design and stated he was proud of <br />the State for adopting it. He also thanked the Council for removing the related agenda items <br />from consideration that evening. <br /> <br />Mr. John Hornby, 15387 Geranium Street NW, addressed the Ramsey City Council <br />regarding the Minnesota state flag discussion. He stated that he served 35 years in the <br />military and expressed frustration that Minnesota residents were not allowed to vote <br />directly on the new state flag. He argued that the decision should not have been made by a <br />small commission and believed the matter should have appeared on a statewide ballot. He <br />also indicated that the former state flag better represented Minnesota and claimed that <br />residents in other states had criticized the new design during his travels. He questioned why <br />the issue continued to be debated and urged support for the former Minnesota flag. <br /> <br />Ms. Jacqueline Christensen, 16460 St. Francis Boulevard NW, addressed the Ramsey City <br />Council regarding the Minnesota state flag discussion. She began by referencing the City’s <br />mission and vision statements, which center on collaboration, responsible growth, and <br />efficient government services. She explained that while history is important, discussions <br />surrounding the former state flag should also acknowledge the painful history experienced <br />by Indigenous communities in Minnesota, including forced removal from ancestral lands, <br />the Dakota War of 1862, the mass execution in Mankato, internment near Fort Snelling, <br />and long-term systemic inequities affecting Native Americans. <br /> <br />Ms. Christensen also referenced prior comments made during a 2021 Council discussion <br />that compared mask requirements during the COVID-19 pandemic to the internment of <br />Japanese Americans during World War II, arguing that historical context matters when <br />discussing public symbols and representation. She questioned whether revisiting the flag <br />City Council / May 12, 2026 <br />Page 6 of 15 <br /> <br />