Laserfiche WebLink
Motion carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson Elvig, Councilmembers Olson and Elvig. Voting No: <br />None. <br />Further discussion: Chairperson Elvig directed staff to look into moving the speed limit sign in <br />this area on 167th Avenue down the road slightly. He noted there have been problems with <br />speeding on this road, but the signs are placed in a location where they are easily missed when <br />turning the corner. <br />Case #6: Consider Alternatives to Address Ermine Boulevard Floodplain Issue <br />City Engineer Jankowski stated last spring the City was made aware of a possible violation of <br />floodplain regulations at 9421 Ermine Boulevard NW. A May 12, 2005 letter from Mr. David <br />Scheim of FEMA resulted from an investigation of a request by Mr. Joel Burns, the property <br />owner of 9421 Ermine Boulevard NW for a letter of Map Revision in November 2003. This <br />issue was presented to the Public Works Committee at the July 19, 2005 meeting resulting in the <br />authorization of a proposal from the Polaris Group to verify the accuracy of the floodplain maps <br />and to address possible solutions to this issue. Polaris has completed their work and has prepared <br />a report, which summarizes the issue and offers a number of alternatives for providing resolution <br />of this situation. He reviewed the following alternatives to be considered: <br />• Alternative 1 Move Structure - Cost $90, 000 to $130, 000 <br />The house and the accessory structures could be moved out of the floodway and onto an <br />adjacent lot owned by the City immediately to the west. <br />• Alternative 2 Property Buyout - Cost $115,000 <br />The house would be purchased under a 50% cost share program available through the <br />MnDNR and the house and foundation would be removed. The funding for the DNR <br />share of this alternative is not guaranteed and there will be competition for funding. <br />• Alternative 3 Regrade Ermine Street west of Property - Cost $SS, 000 <br />This would allow the floodway to spill over the road as it currently does, but in a <br />location further to the west that would allow the violating property to be outside the <br />revised floodway. <br />• Alternative 4lnstall Twin Box Culverts - Cost $120,000 to $160,000 <br />The existing 72 inch culvert would be replaced with two 60 foot long 10 x 7 box culverts <br />that would allow the floodway to be revised so that the entire 100 year flood would be <br />carried through the culvert and would no longer overtop Ermine Boulevard. In addition <br />this alternative may require the acquisition of easements if the installation of the twin <br />culverts cannot be confined within the OHW of Trott Brook. <br />• Alternative S Combination of Culvert Replacement & Ermine Street Regrading- Cost <br />$90, 000 to $100, 000 <br />This alternative is a combination of Alternative 3 & 4. It calls for the replacement of the <br />existing 72 inch culvert with a single 12 x 7 foot box culvert and a less extensive need to <br />regrade Ermine Boulevard. However, this alternative would not provide enough culvert <br />capacity to prevent the overtopping of Ermine Boulevard during the 100 year flood <br />event. <br />Public Works Committee / Apri118, 2006 <br />Page 8 of 10 <br />