Laserfiche WebLink
OTHER OBSERVATIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS <br />Internal Controls Over Vendors <br />A relatively common method of attempting to defraud local governments involves inducing them to pay <br />claims from fictitious vendors for goods or services that were never provided. Strong safeguards over <br />adding new vendors or making changes to existing vendors within the government's accounts payable <br />system is an important control to mitigate this risk. Some considerations in this area include: <br />• Limiting the number of employees with access to add or alter vendor records within the accounts <br />payable system, <br />• Requiring vendor additions or changes to be reviewed and approved by supervisory personnel, <br />preferably one not directly involved in processing accounts payable, <br />• Verifying the legitimacy of vendors by obtaining a W-9 or other means, <br />• Verifying any changes to vendor address or banking information prior to processing payments, <br />and <br />• Periodically reviewing the vendor listing to remove inactive vendors from the system. <br />Uniform Guidance Revisions <br />Although the City did not earn enough federal funding to require a Single Audit of its expenditures of <br />federal awards this year, if the City receives any federal funding it is obligated to maintain a <br />comprehensive system of internal controls over federal grant compliance that is up to date with current <br />requirements. The U.S. Office of Management and Budget issued a revision to Title 2 U.S. Code of <br />Federal Regulations Part 200, Uniform Administrative Requirements, Cost Principles, and Audit <br />Requirements for Federal Awards (Uniform Guidance) in 2024, aiming to streamline grant management <br />and reduce grantor agency and recipient burden. The revised guidance is effective for new federal grant <br />entitlements awarded on or after October 1, 2024. <br />The revision includes a number of significant changes to the federal Single Audit process, including: an <br />increase in dollar threshold for requiring a Single Audit from $750,000 to $1,000,000; changes to the <br />thresholds and process used for determining major programs; an increase in the threshold for the <br />disposition of equipment and remitting unused supplies from $5,000 to $10,000; and an increase in the <br />federal de minimis indirect cost rate from 10 percent to 15 percent. Key changes to written policy <br />requirements for recipients include: enhancement of cybersecurity controls, inclusion of veteran -owned <br />businesses to the group of entities for procurement preference, and a broadened scope for reporting of <br />mandatory disclosures. We recommend the City review its internal control policies to ensure compliance <br />with current guidance. <br />SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES <br />Management is responsible for the selection and use of appropriate accounting policies. The significant <br />accounting policies used by the City are described in Note 1 of the notes to basic financial statements. No <br />new accounting policies were adopted, and the application of existing policies was not changed during the <br />year. <br />We noted no transactions entered into by the City during the year for which there is a lack of authoritative <br />guidance or consensus. All significant transactions have been recognized in the financial statements in the <br />proper period. <br />-2- <br />