Laserfiche WebLink
<br />7.06: Adopt Resolution #26-102 Designating the Historic Minnesota State Flag as the <br />Official Flag of the City of Ramsey to Ensure Local Control and Fiscal Responsibility <br /> <br />Mayor Heineman introduced Item 7.6, consideration of Resolution #26-102 to designate the <br />historic Minnesota State flag as the official flag of the City of Ramsey to ensure local control and <br />fiscal responsibility. He then opened the floor to public comment and invited residents wishing to <br />comment on the item to come forward and state their name. <br /> <br />Ms. Amy Hodges, 7463 159th Avenue Northwest, Ramsey, explained that she attended the <br />meeting primarily to show opposition to the resolution. She described Ramsey as a welcoming, <br />growing community that she and her family chose for its positive environment, families, and <br />amenities. She expressed concern that the three resolutions under consideration were divisive and <br />inconsistent with the values she believes define the community. She indicated she wanted City <br />resources focused on services and projects that benefit everyone. She respectfully urged the <br />Council to vote against the resolutions so the community could move forward together. <br /> <br />Mr. Brian Walker, 17289 Variolite Street Northwest, agreed with concerns about potential state <br />funding consequences tied to communities choosing to continue using the historic Minnesota flag, <br />describing that approach as partisan politics. He noted previous Minnesota flags had never been <br />selected through a statewide public vote and pointed out there had been opportunities for public <br />input during the redesign process. He questioned why the discussion focused on the flag rather <br />than the state seal and argued that there is no state requirement mandating the use of a specific <br />flag. He stated that he believed the proposal was unnecessary and a poor use of City resources, and <br />encouraged the Council to continue current practices without taking formal action. <br /> <br />Mr. Todd Embury, 9041 159th Lane Northwest, Ramsey, stated that he had previously addressed <br />the same issue two weeks earlier and indicated that he had not seen significant public demand for <br />the proposed action. He remarked that the state flag redesign process appeared to have followed <br />the proper procedures and included opportunities for public input. He questioned whether the <br />matter warranted additional Council time and resources, noting the limited public attendance <br />compared to other local issues he considered more important to residents. He encouraged the <br />Council to consider how the proposal reflects on the City and whether the time and effort involved <br />are serving the broader community interest. <br /> <br />Mr. Michael Swanson, 5368 140th Court Northwest, expressed concern that the historic Minnesota <br />flag contains the former state seal and argued that adopting it as an official City flag would endorse <br />a symbol no longer recognized by the state. He stated that the redesign process had been widely <br />publicized and included opportunities for public participation, noting that he followed it even while <br />living outside Minnesota. He also questioned whether the proposal reflected the views of Ramsey <br />residents as a whole and expressed concern that the action could create division within the <br />community. <br /> <br />Mr. Rodney Allen, 5731 142nd Avenue Northwest, Ramsey, stated he believed Councilmembers <br />serve the City with good intentions and encouraged the Council to focus on issues he believed <br />were most important to residents. He expressed embarrassment that the historic Minnesota flag <br />continues to be displayed, explaining he believes the flag represents a negative and divisive <br />City Council /May 26, 2026 <br />Page 8 of 19 <br /> <br />