My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 02/06/2003
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2003
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 02/06/2003
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 9:30:14 AM
Creation date
6/4/2003 11:07:58 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
02/06/2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
138
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Street Supervisor Reimer replied 13 to 16 feet· <br /> <br /> Councilmember Pearson inquired if staff felt that they could work with <br /> proposed· <br /> <br /> Street Supervisor Reimer replied that they felt that they work with the wi and <br /> setbacks. <br /> <br /> Councilmember Pearson inquired' if there' was any concern with th~ part <br /> <br /> Director of Pubhc Works/Frre Chief Kapler stated that the~ff £~epartment had some concern <br /> ;iast~athc~rOpnae/k~Y~nSt~;t:t~a~;yh~v~tl:~ePrcOoPmO~~t~t2~~e ad ',quate if there <br /> Councflmember Strommen mqmred as to where parking W~_"~gO! be ~11o~ 'ed w~thin .the <br /> development · . <br /> <br /> Ci, Engineer Jankowski explained that with the 32 feet wide roads ill ~! h any parking <br /> resmct~ons. If the one-way street l~,.;i~;~de parking would be all one-s~de of the <br /> <br /> Councilmember Strommen inquired if ~re trucks ove through the one-way <br /> streets at a w~dth of 20 feet. <br /> <br /> C~ty Engineer Janko~s~.,rephed yes expla~at there would be an mght-foot parking lane <br /> and a 12-foot t~o.,..a..gl~m~,~ <br /> <br /> S ommen that on-s ee could be a conce n ' <br /> <br /> Pr/nm"~l' P'i~}~[ Tmdg~'~X~..t,,~e.d. that;~SG~veloper is proposing a median through the main <br /> · ~¢,~,:Y~.%: ,.,,~)5~'~: ""~,"::;~;.7"~:'~'¢~'·;'~'r~:~.':5:<'~j~' . · · <br /> drive of the d'evelO~'B~t"~ the past has not allowed them. 'If the. Council <br />inclined to permi~edian staff woul~like to see some type of agreement to assure that it is <br />.~!:a<:gmng.',r59. be mamtal~, roperly by the homeowners not at the expense of the C~ty. He also <br />notea'~c~at;staff would ri~to fi.el~test some the turning radms being proposed to make- sure they <br />can accommodate fire tru6~i~it snow plows. <br /> <br /> Councflmemb~.~lv~g ~nqmred ff there was a speed or momentum that a snowplow has to <br /> maintain to plo~i}~he streets. <br /> <br /> Street Suver~i~0r Reimer rephed no, but. noted that they will probably need a small track to clean <br /> '~'~'~{~ound th~,m~lians. ' · ' <br /> <br /> Cou~"~;ember Elvig inquired if that would be a large cost. to the City. <br /> <br />City CounCil/January 21,. 2003 <br /> Page 3 of 9 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.