My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 11/07/2002
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2002
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 11/07/2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 9:29:20 AM
Creation date
6/4/2003 11:23:20 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
11/07/2002
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
247
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br /> <br /> d.The City Council finding that an EAW is not necessary or warranted for the Villas of <br /> Meadow Point subdivision. <br /> e. Other items as required by City Council ./..,:¥:.,/~ <br /> <br /> Principal Planner Trudgeon noted that since the last meeting the plat has been c~'~d to provide <br />I for a private road to accommodate the single family lots, which resulted in:"~"kedU'~,bn of one <br /> single family lot. .,~'i~i~'i:!~',i . <br />I Councilmember Hendriksen stated that the City already has townhome, owne'~i'"'(~ith private ~,.. <br /> knocking on their door for the City to plow them which is why:'~i~e:,~f thee?are opposed, <br /> private roads period. ' ,?~??:?~' <br /> <br /> Councilmember Anderson inquired if the single family ~k would be part of the association. <br />I Principal City Engineer Olson replied that the singl~i~i~i:homes wi~i:~e...part of the association <br /> and able to use the community building being.proposed for the.,i~en.t,,ef~6~f th'~51'Site. <br />-I C0uncilmember Kurak inquired if they could address the'"':~'~ade"~ ';;~'t'~'~' difference~ between the <br /> development and Mr. Bfidwell's property. '~'tiiiiii%~ <br /> I . . . .:~ ::: ,,..: ; :: . . . ':*'~i,;~77,~ . . · <br /> Pnnc~pal Planner Trudgeon explained 'that Mr: Bndwell originally had conCern w~th the on~nal <br /> gading plan that showed some 'graglng on i~Si'~property, which has:b~een eliminated by the <br /> construction of a retaining wail. He ~ii~o noted that'i:th~:'!tde~eloper,has also been in the contact <br />I with Mr. Bridwell and they have possiblY:reached ~i~gree~ilt:to:~.~rchase his property. <br /> Councilmember Kurak inquired if the grade's:iSaaC"was being ~ted by the developer. <br />1 <br />· Principal City Engineer Ol~6n replied that th~:~i~eep ~ade already exists. ' <br /> <br />I Councilm~mber Kurak verified that there would'ii~6~:be any land moving around outlot B. <br /> <br />I principal. CitY Engineer.Ols0ii'i:eplied iSchat' ~h~{ was correct. ' <br /> <br /> Councilmember Hendriksen stated that Mr. Bridwell had objected to the road connection going <br />I to h~s property. "~,-: ,. <br /> <br />I Principal Planner Trudge0n; ~lied that that was correct. They have requested that the two <br /> outlots be combined into one outlot and then the location of the road will be determined at a <br /> future date. ~,' ~' ' <br /> <br />I Kevin McGee," Allstate Development, stated that they have worked an ageement with Mr. <br /> Bridwell to acquire his property and they are in the process of writing the agreement. The <br /> COuncil had asi~ed for a sketch plan of the entire site fully developed as well as a plan without <br /> the ~ 6-un/ts. He explained that the development proposal with the 16-units would not require the <br /> construction of a retaining wall. <br /> <br /> City Council/October 22, 2002 <br />I Page 27 of 35 <br /> P147 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.