Laserfiche WebLink
CC Regular Session <br />Meeting Date: <br />Primary Strategic Plan Initiative: <br />06/23/2026 <br />Identify and implement operational efficiencies, cost savings and additional <br />funding sources. <br />7. 3. <br />Title: <br />Introduce Ordinance #26-09 Amending City Code Section 106-354 (Private Trees in New Development Areas) <br />Purpose/Background: <br />Recently, the City Council approved a variance for a development project authorizing the use of a different <br />methodology to complete the required tree inventory. When the City Council approved this variance, they also <br />directed Staff to prepare an ordinance to amend City Code to allow Staff to review and approve alternative <br />methodologies rather than requiring a project to seek a variance. The purpose of this case is to consider a draft <br />Ordinance amending the tree preservation standards. <br />Notification: <br />A public hearing notice was placed in the Legal section of the Anoka Union Herald newspaper. <br />Time Frame/Observations/Alternatives: <br />Language has been added specifying that alternative methods for collecting significant tree data can be approved <br />by the Zoning Administrator (defined in City Code as the Community Development Department) with sufficient <br />documentation/information that supports and justifies such a request. Additionally, clarification was added <br />regarding what trees may be exempted from the removal threshold calculation (exempting trees infested with <br />Emerald Ash Borer [EAB] or infected with Oak Wilt or Dutch Elm Disease). <br />The Environmental Policy Board (EPB) reviewed the draft Ordinance Amendment at their May 11, 2026, <br />meeting. There was brief discussion regarding whether any diseased tree should be exempted from the removal <br />calculation or limit it to only those maladies that are generally considered to be lethal without treatment. <br />Ultimately, the EPB unanimously supported and recommended approval of the draft Ordinance Amendment as <br />written. The City Attorney has also reviewed the draft Ordinance Amendment and had no concerns with it. <br />The Planning Commission conducted a public hearing regarding Ordinance #26-09 at their May 28, 2026, <br />meeting. There were no written or verbal comments received regarding the proposed Ordinance amendment and <br />the Planning Commission unanimously supported the Ordinance amendment. <br />Funding Source: <br />This case is being handled as part of Staffs regular duties. <br />Recommendation: <br />The Environmental Policy Board and Planning Commission both recommend adopting Ordinance #26-09, <br />amending the tree preservation standards to authorize Staff to approve alternative methodologies used for <br />collecting tree data (rather than requiring a project to apply for a variance) and clarifying that certain diseased or <br />insect -infested trees are exempt from the removal threshold calculation. <br />Outcome/Action: <br />Motion to introduce Ordinance #26-09 amending Chapter 106 (Zoning Code). <br />