My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 09/05/2002
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2002
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 09/05/2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 9:29:01 AM
Creation date
6/4/2003 11:35:30 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
09/05/2002
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
106
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
there were no plans to pu'~ in irrigation on the north side, nor in the area designated for <br />expansion. There is a fence on the west side. Asphalt Technolo~es is the adjoining proper9', to <br />the west. This neig&lbor has shared in the cost of putting iv,/along~the fence in Phase 2. <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixx suggested the applicant work wkh the Staff to resolve these issues. <br /> <br />Motion by Chairperson NLx-t, seconded by Commissioner Reeve, to approve the proposed site <br />plan for T.J. & Associates Printing, with the direction to confer with Staff to resolve landscaping <br />issues, and contingent upon compliance with Cit',/Staff review letter dated May 31, 2002 and <br />Sunfish Gateway receiving final plat approval and the Developer recording the plat at Anoka <br />County. <br /> <br />Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson NLxt, Commissioners Reeve, Brauer, and Kociscak. <br />Voting No: None. Absent: Commissioners Johnson, Sweet, and Watson. <br /> <br />Case #6: <br /> <br />Request for Sketch Plan Review of Allstate Development; Case of Allstate <br />Development <br /> <br />Presentation <br /> <br />Principal Planner Tmdgeon stated .Mlstate Development LLC has applied for sketch plan review <br />of a townhome development. The property is generally located in the triangular area formed by <br />the intersection ofNowthen Blvd, Sunfish Lake Blvd., and Alpine Dr. The property is currently <br />zoned R.-1 Rural Residential. Recent amendments to the Kamsey Comprehensive Plan have <br />included the property, the lvfUSA and designated the land as Medium Density Residential. Under <br />the new proposed zoning map, the land will be designated as R-2, which allows for townhomes <br />and a net density of up to seven units per acre. The property is approxrrnately 22.97 acres in size. <br />The sketch plan is proposing 20 two-unit buildings, one 4-unit building, and eight 16-unit <br />buildings and one single-family lot for a total of 157 units, which equates to a goss density of <br />6.83 units per acre. There appears to be wetlands present on the property; therefore the number <br />of units may have to be reduced in order to comply with the net density max/mum. The total' <br />density attainable may also be impacted by the site plan review. He stated the new private street <br />policy requires a main public street through the project.area, which this sketch plan shows. The <br />private street policy restricts primate streets to 300 feet; unless a cul-de-sac is provided, then the <br />private street can be as long as 600 feet. The private streets shown appear to meet the private <br />street standards, however further review Mil need to be done at the prelim/nary plat stage. The <br />applicant is proposing to provide public roads to access Alpine Dr. and Nowthen Blvd. (CSAH <br />5). The access on Nowthen will need A. noka County approval. The sketch plan is also showing <br />future accesses to the north and the southeast. They are surrounded by county roads and typically <br />the county doesn't want to ~ant excess entrances. The city feels more than one is necessary and <br />would advocate for this. A detailed drainage and goring plan will be addressed dur/ng the <br />preliminary plat and site plan process. ,, At the present time, there does not appear to be any <br />designated area for stormwater ponds. This will need to be shown on the drainage and. grading <br />plan and may impact the total number of units allowed. The project is also subject to the review <br />and permitting process of the Lower Rum River Watershed Management Organization (W!VIO) <br /> <br />Planning Commission/June 6, 2002 <br /> Page 11 of 15 <br /> <br />43 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.