My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Planning Commission - 05/02/2002
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Planning Commission
>
2002
>
Agenda - Planning Commission - 05/02/2002
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/21/2025 9:28:33 AM
Creation date
6/4/2003 12:12:00 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
05/02/2002
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
255
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br />I <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Chairperson Nixt referred to the Staff Review letter on March 27 stating the adol: <br />rezoning ordinance is subject to Metropolitan Council approval, and he questioned <br />ti-ds. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Frolik responded the zoning' ordinance <br />and it doesn't go to the Council for the second reading until the Me~ropo <br />it. <br /> <br />Motion by Chairperson Nixt, seconded by Commissioner Reeve <br /> <br />Motion Carried. Voting Yes: Chairperson NixL <br />Kociscak, Sweet, and Watson. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />:, Brauer, <br /> <br />The public heating closed at 7:47 p.m. <br /> <br />Commission Business <br /> <br /> Chairperson Nixt called the regular meet~g.~,~,~:,, of the. Planning £ . at 7:47 <br /> <br /> Co~smon Watson pointed ~ere',:~,a lot ofvmO/}~z~~ ~s c~e. <br /> <br /> Co~mmoner Sweet suggested the case':~a~tabled~,,~t~" o~er bG'~eg sub~t thek ~swers to the <br /> vmables. , <br /> <br /> ~e Co~issiOn58~hfifi:~d::~e var/ables as the v~ce, the zomg, ~d ~e Setback issue. <br /> <br /> 'ChaiCerso~Nixt co~ente~at 295 uNts for ~s ~e~ and ~o~er'development <br /> on the s6~:side of alpine:~e: <br /> <br /> Ci~ En~neer S:t~e. Zha~erson Nixt ~at a ~affic generation analysis <br /> should be re0ueste~:m:heu of~e proF i.' . , ' <br /> <br />..... · Co~mI0ner~.,,...,. JoMson%~entm~ed~:~ the ~affic~pact ~s understood w~ ~e approval of <br /> "'~?"~'~":'~"Sis would be more for ~e plat ~ for T.H. ~7. <br /> rezoning. ':~0~added that <br /> <br /> Chai~erson N~.pointed'~but ~e M~ch 15, 2002 le~er ~om ~OT suggests consideration of <br /> mm lanes an~o~ byp~s l~es due to the negative impact on traffic from-~e Ngh-de~i~ <br /> housing developments. <br /> <br /> Comm~ssmn'er Komscak noted ~s area was rezoned ~om. b~iness to Ngh densiW.residential, <br /> i~ tr~m~ b~=~=n the zones should be ~Nmal. <br /> <br /> C~i~erson Nixt questioned what the stares is on the sound mitigation. <br /> <br />Planning Commission/April 4, 2002 <br /> Page 5 of 14 <br /> <br />175 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.