Laserfiche WebLink
City Engineer Steve Jankowsk/stated it is anticipated that a sound wall-Will be required. <br />a report was expected to arrive by now, 'and it hasn't. <br /> <br />Commissioner Sweet reverted to the issue of too many variables. <br /> <br />Commissioner Brauer stated his concern.was the 10-foot setback. He <br />even if all the other pieces fell into place, this issue would remain. <br /> <br />Commissioner Johnson questioned wi~ether the wetland prohibits <br /> <br />Mr. Solintrop explained the plat cannot handle the storm w~ounts <br />changed. He said he would like to maximize the amou e back <br />occur m losm~ umts ~f they had to comply w~th the oral--ce. He <br />move as many as possible around to meet the code <br />meet the ordinance. <br /> <br />cxces: <br /> <br />if <br /> <br />setback cannot.be <br />A hardship would <br />it may be better to <br /> few that cannot <br /> <br />Motion by Commissioner Johnson, seconded by Chairperson, recommend, that City <br />Council approve the preliminary plat f%~Evergeen Point contingent _. <br /> <br />1. - Compliance with City Sta~i.~d~ie~-~:~:~taled March 27, : ~ that the actual <br /> number of units allowedi-iS~:;gubj!~}? the r~f~e Site plan a~Spioval process ' · <br /> <br />2, Applicant mitigation o~rianc~fi~d City C% ~J~tSat effort <br />o. Conmderahon of open space requ~ment an~ eaton ~. <br />4. Subject to intemai traffic generati3~a <br /> <br />Motmn Camed~7:.MOting~¥~: Cha~erson ~ Co~mmoners Jonson, Komsc~, ~d Reeve. <br />Voting No: Co~ms~oners~Brauer, Sweet, ~aBam Absent: None. <br /> <br />PL~G..COMMISS IO~ BUSINESS <br /> <br />Case~4: of Evergreen Poht; CaSe of Ed~a <br /> )ment <br /> <br />Community <br /> <br />Frolik stated that the City received an application from Edina <br /> <br />! <br />! <br /> <br /> Development plan gev~ew to develop 112 townhomes on the Property located west of <br /> H~ghway #4? ~.f~north of Alpine Drive N.W. The property ~s approxamatety _4.11 acres m size. <br /> '~;,-. ~ ~;,, , ~-,l ,.~ ....... <br /> ":.,i;;i::,~ ,::,~ and currently z~.~i:~d R-.> Urban Remdentml, which allows for medmm denmty' remdent~al <br /> :'::;~ :i::}! ~developmen~'~ii'~ density not to exceed 7 umts Per acre~ The net denmty (subtracting Alpine <br />· '2iD~hve and, T~?'#47.. road right-of-ways and wetlands) is 6.9 units per acre. The proposed· <br /> t:O~Wrrhom:e'~: ~onsist of two, four, and six unit structures. In accordance with the newly adopted' <br /> stre~tP:ol'icy for multiple residential developments and suggestions from City Staff, Planning <br /> commission and City Council, the units wi-Il receive access from a combination of public streets <br /> <br />Planning Commission/April 4, 2002 <br /> Page 6 of 14 <br /> <br />107 <br /> <br /> <br />