Laserfiche WebLink
THE IMPACT OF RESPONSIBLE BIDDER ORDINANCES ON UNION CONTRACTORS IN ILLINOIS AND INDIANA <br />and living standards of construction workers without significantly raising costs for taxpayers" (Waddoups <br />& May, 201.4). <br />In April 2013, Kansas Governor Sam Brownback signed a bill into law that prohibited cities and counties <br />from requiring contractors to pay locally prevailing wages "or offer an employee benefit other than those <br />required by state or federal law," which included apprenticeship training contributions (IHB 2069, 2013). <br />This state pre-emption law invalidated local construction policies in Sedgwick County and Wyandotte <br />County. A 2016 report investigated more than 1,300 bids on school construction and non-residential <br />projects in those counties between 2005 and 2016. While the author concluded that there was no <br />statistical difference in the total cost of non-residential construction projects due to the repeal of the local <br />construction policies, the data did reveal that school construction costs were $67 cheaper per square foot <br />during the years when the policies were in place (Kelsay, 2016). <br />The most recent research on RBOs reviewed more than 1,200 public projects in Illinois and Indiana <br />(Manzo, .2020). The analysis found that RBOs encourage 8 percent more bid competition on taxpayer - <br />funded projects and increase the market share of union contractors by between 9 percent and 12 <br />percent —suggesting that nonunion contractors are less likely to contribute to apprenticeship training <br />programs and less likely to comply with state, local, and federal laws. RBOs are also associated with more <br />work for contractors who pay family -supporting wages, which helps attract and retain qualified workers. <br />Because RBOs promote apprenticeship programs and produce skilled tradespeople, they have no <br />statistical impact on total construction costs. Notably, when focusing on the nonunion segment of the <br />construction industry, RBO-covered projects awarded to nonunion contractors were no more costly than <br />nonunion projects that were not covered by RBOs (Manzo, 2020). <br />In addition to keeping construction costs stable, RBOs promote better labor market outcomes. A 2018 <br />case study of county -level RBOs in Indiana found that all the countywide RBOs in Indiana required both <br />contractors and subcontractors bidding on public projects to participate in U.S. Department of Labor - <br />approved apprenticeship training programs. As a result, worker turnover in the heavy and civil engineering <br />construction sector —which includes the construction of roads, bridges, bike lanes, utility lines, and public <br />parks —was 2 percent lower in the counties with RBOs. Construction workers also earned 8 percent more <br />in the counties with RBOs. Because they incentivize apprenticeship training, RBOs are associated with <br />stable employment and middle-class careers for skilled construction workers (Manzo & Manzo, 2018). <br />RBOs ensure that reputable contractors with proven track records complete jobs efficiently. Contractors <br />with workplace law violations are more than five times as likely to have a low performance rating as <br />contractors with a clean record of workplace law compliance (Adller, 2003). By weeding out cut-rate <br />contractors, RBOs ensure that public bodies get the quality they pay for and encourage successful projects <br />that are on time and on budget. In fact, case studies from across the country have found that RBOs <br />promote higher quality and more reliable services, increased competition among responsible contractors, <br />and reduced back -end reconstruction and litigation costs (Sonn & Gebreselassie, 2010). Additionally, <br />evidence suggests that 98 percent of construction owners using qualifications -based procurement <br />models —like those in RBOs—report being satisfied with project quality (Kashiwagi et at, 2005) <br />2 <br />