Laserfiche WebLink
<br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />It <br />,I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />'1',1 <br />,I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />'Ii <br />'" <br />,~ <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />I <br /> <br />Ramsey Fire Station No 2 Replacement Study <br />Feasibility Study <br />Ramsey. Minnesota <br />BKY Group 1272.05 <br /> <br />BKcV <br /> <br />GROUP <br /> <br />Option Cost Estimates <br /> <br />The attached estimates outline the costs associated with the re-use concepts Option I and Option 2 and replacement <br />fire station Option 3 and were prepared by BKY Group based on the enclosed plan concept document. Estimates <br />should be considered as comparative only. final project budgets should be established following more detailed <br />Schematic Design efforts for any of the options explored in this report. comparisons of overall project scope. <br />however, may be made with these figures as project assumptions have been kept consistent. <br /> <br />The Preliminary Project estimates are as follows: <br /> <br />Initial Pr~ject Option Costs <br /> <br />Construction Cost <br /> <br />"Soft Costs" I Contingency <br /> <br />Total Project Cost <br /> <br />Option I. Stabilization . $270.000 <br />Option II - Partial Demo $621,220 <br />Option III - New Construction $1.781,640 <br /> <br />$82.262 <br /> <br />$196.345 <br /> <br />$626.353 <br /> <br />$352.262 <br /> <br />$817.565 <br /> <br />$2,407,993 <br /> <br />Project Cost Comparison <br /> <br />Options I and II above each assume the construction of a new replacement fire station within five to eight years. As <br />such, a comparison to overall project feasibility should include in assessment of initial option costs (as outlined above) <br />as well as total project costs which include new construction costs and inflation cOsts over time. The following <br />assume a five year delay prior to con,s~ruction_9f a new replacement fire station for Options I and 1/ and compare <br />those total project costs against new construction for Option III in 2007 <br /> <br />Initial Project Scope <br /> <br />New Construction ,New Construction Inflation to 2012 T ota! Project . <br /> <br />Option I <br />Option II <br />Option III <br /> <br />$2,4'07.993 <br /> <br />$2,407,993 <br /> <br />" $2,407.993 <br /> <br />$3.399,141 <br /> <br />$3.864,444 <br /> <br />$2,407,993 <br /> <br />$352,262 <br />$817,565 <br />. $0 <br /> <br />$638,883 . <br /> <br />$638,883 <br /> <br />$0 <br /> <br />As outlined above, Options I and II have higher long-term project costs, with Option I totaling 37% more total project <br />costs and Option II totaling 61 % more total project costs then Option III. <br /> <br />Please see the attached preliminary detailed cost estimate break-down <br /> <br />Architectural Space Program Report <br />Comm, No. 1573.02 <br /> <br />Date. <br />