My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council Work Session - 08/10/2026
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council Work Session
>
2026
>
Agenda - Council Work Session - 08/10/2026
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/12/2026 4:51:21 PM
Creation date
8/10/2026 9:13:44 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council Work Session
Document Date
08/10/2026
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
370
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Prevailing Wage Policies: Preventing <br />Workplace Abuses Before They Happen <br />What are prevailing wage laws? <br />• For nearly 100 years, the federal Davis -Bacon Act has helped <br />to ensure that local contractors can compete on a level <br />playing field for federally funded projects. The law was co- <br />sponsored by two Republican senators (James Davis - PA and <br />Robert Bacon - NY) based on concerns about contractors <br />from low -wage markets undercutting contractors from their <br />respective states. <br />• Prevailing wage laws set the wage and benefit floor based on <br />local survey data of the going rate for particular crafts. This <br />ensures that work on government -financed projects does not <br />undercut area standards. It levels the playing field for local <br />workers and local contractors. <br />• Publicly funded projects generally award bids to contractors <br />who have the lowest -cost bid to do the work by the <br />government's standards. Without prevailing wage <br />requirements, a simple way to cut bid costs is by cutting <br />worker pay and benefits, creating a race -to -the -bottom which <br />can encourage practices like wage theft and other payroll <br />fraud. <br />Worker exploitation and tax fraud are <br />common in the construction industry; <br />prevailing wage policies prevent it. <br />Prevailing wage policies protect construction workers from <br />wage theft and exploitation, and ensure that responsible <br />contractors are not put out of business by unfair <br />competition. <br />o Our Subsidizing Abuse report found 33 publicly <br />subsidized housing projects that have employed <br />contractors tied to proven or alleged exploitation of <br />workers. In total, these 33 projects have received over $84 <br />million in taxpayer subsidies. <br />o These cases are just the tip of the iceberg. Midwest <br />Economic Policy Institute estimates that 30,100 <br />Minnesota construction workers are misclassified or are <br />paid off the books, accounting for 23 percent of th <br />workforce. These illegally employed construction workers <br />earn 36 percent less ($29,700 annually) in combined <br />wages and fringe benefits [1], while Minnesota loses $136 <br />million in state tax revenues due to payroll fraud. <br />o Prevailing wage policies increase payroll transparency <br />reducing the risk of misclassification on a project! <br />Certified payroll collection is a mechanism to minimize <br />the reliance on informal employment relationships and <br />off -the -books payments on a construction site. It <br />encourages accurate data and sufficient employer <br />monitoring of a jobsite, which prevents the types of <br />crimes found in Subsidizing Abuse. <br />Research overwhelmingly shows that <br />prevailing wage requirements do not <br />increase construction costs. <br />• 18-of-24 peer -reviewed studies conducted between 2000- <br />2022 found that prevailing wage laws have no effect on the <br />cost of public construction projects. [2] <br />• A 2018 analysis by the Midwest Economic Policy Institute of <br />640 contractor bids on school construction projects in <br />Minnesota found that winning bids based on the payment <br />of prevailing wages are no more costly than bids that do <br />not require prevailing wages. [3] <br />Recent rigorous peer -reviewed research has found, at <br />most, slight project cost impacts from prevailing wage <br />policies on housing projects. [4] A 2021 study in the <br />International Journal of Employment Relations found <br />modest impacts of prevailing wage on overall project cost, <br />and that any cost impacts are likely explained by the <br />widespread prevalence of "illegal and undesirable <br />practices" in the construction industry. [5] <br />Economic research finds that prevailing wage laws <br />increase apprenticeship training, boost worker <br />productivity, and reduce injury rates - helping to address <br />the skilled labor shortage in construction. [6] This may help <br />explain why the cost of prevailing wage construction is <br />comparable to non -prevailing wage construction: <br />increased reliance on highly trained workers leads to fewer <br />costly mistakes and greater efficiencies. <br />QUESTIONS? CONTACT EXECUTIVE <br />DIRECTOR JAKE SCHWITZER AT <br />JAKE@NORTHSTARPOLICY.ORG OR <br />651-300-9974. <br />NOTES <br />[1] Nathaniel Goodell and Frank Manzo IV, "The Costs of and Wage Theft Payroll <br />Fraud in the Construction Industries of Wisconsin, Minnesota, and Illinois <br />Impacts on Workers and Taxpayers," Midwest Economic Policy Institute, 2021, <br />available here: httos://midwesteoi.files.wordoress.com/2020/10/meoi-ileoi- <br />costs-of-oavroll-fraud-in-wi-mn-il-final. odf <br />[2] Manzo, Frank and Kevin Duncan. "An Examination of Minnesota's Prevailing <br />Wage Law Effects on Costs, Training, and Economic Development." Midwest <br />Economic Policy Institute. July 2018. <br />httos://midwesteoi.fi les.word oress.com/2018/07/mepi-csu-exam ination-of- <br />minnesotas-prevailin-wale-law-final.odf (Accessed February 5, 2023). i. <br />[3] Manzo and Duncan 2018, i. <br />[4] See attached table of peer -reviewed studies. The 7.94% cost impact figure is <br />the average of the five studies which found cost impacts, excluding the Palm & <br />Niemeier results of 16.0%; averaging the results of all six studies finds an <br />average impact of 9.28% <br />[5] Hinkel, Matthew, and Dale Belman. "Should prevailing wages prevail? Re- <br />examining the effect of prevailing wage laws on affordable housing construction <br />costs." British Journal of Industrial Relations 60, no. 4 (2022): 761-783. <br />[6] Ibid. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.