My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Public Works Committee - 08/21/2001
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Public Works Committee
>
2000 - 2009
>
2001
>
Minutes - Public Works Committee - 08/21/2001
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 9:35:14 AM
Creation date
6/6/2003 11:25:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Public Works Committee
Document Date
08/21/2001
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
11
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
City Engineer 01son noted that of the six examples three of the developments are not townhouse <br />related and three are. He stated that it is very common throughout other communities to allow <br />private developments because townhomes are more linear and have many more accesses. An <br />apartment building has a parking area that is designated and there are a lot more people in a <br />central location. In townhomes they are more spread out so they basically need a longer parking <br />lot. <br /> <br />Councihnember Hendriksen replied that with the private streets they are not creating a longer <br />parking lot, but making a narrower road with most of them not having parking and the units <br />being located very close to the road. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kurak suggested making the arterial streets standard streets, with the driveway <br />of those streets being private for the access into the units. She felt that performance standards <br />should be brought up, including the requirement of sweeping streets. <br /> <br />City Engineer 01son stated that he agreed with Councilmember Kurak, but noted the current <br />ordinance states that private streets are not permitted, so the Council needs to decide first if there <br />is to be private streets. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kurak stated that she felt that private streets should be permitted. <br /> <br />Councilmember Anderson suggested that development with private streets be required to include <br />an area for snow storage. <br /> <br />Councilmember Hendriksen stated that essentially the arterial streets should be City streets and <br />he would agree with that. Dead ends off that would be driveways and considered private, but <br />that is where be would draw the line. If they are not driveways then they should be City streets. <br /> <br />Director of Public Works Fire Chief Kapler noted that another aspect that should be considered is <br />Police. He explained that the Police are limited as to what they can enforce on private streets. If <br />the arterial roads are public streets that would give the Police a better ability to serve those types <br />of developments. <br /> <br />Councihnember Kurak in regards to maintenance of private streets she did not feel that the City <br />should be fixing holes in the roads, but if the arterial road is public then the City would correct <br />the problem and the cost would be assessed to the homeowners. If the hole were on the driveway <br />portion then the City would not be responsible. <br /> <br />Councilmember Anderson inquired if it was possible for the Homeowners Associations to give <br />the Police Department permission to Police the private developments. <br /> <br />City Engineer 01son replied that if there is a call from the residents the Police have every right to <br />be in the development, but if there is a problem with speeding traffic, failure to stop they don't <br />have the ability to enforce that. <br /> <br />Public Works Committee/August 21, 2001 <br /> Page 9 of 11 <br /> <br /> <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.