My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 08/25/2026
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2026
>
Agenda - Council - 08/25/2026
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/25/2026 10:38:54 AM
Creation date
8/25/2026 10:03:21 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
08/25/2026
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
323
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
DEPARTMENT OF <br />NATURAL RESOURCES <br />2026 <br />Protect Community Forests <br />Ineligible Project Activities and Expenses <br />Ineligible project expenses include, but are not limited to: <br />• Costs incurred prior to the start date of the fully executed grant agreement. <br />• Purchase of trees listed on the Minnesota Noxious Weed List, or the DNR's Invasive Terrestrial <br />Plants List, including Amur cork tree, Amur maple, autumn olive, black locust, buckthorn, Norway <br />maple, Russian olive, Siberian elm, and tree of heaven. <br />• Purchase of balled and burlapped trees larger than 2.5" caliper, containerized trees larger <br />than #20, or bareroot trees greater than 2" or less than %" caliper diameter. <br />• Purchase of tree species in a genus that already makes up 10% or more of the community's <br />or in a family that makes up 20% or more of the trees. <br />• Purchase of plants other than trees, such as shrubs, living ground covers, sod, grass seed, and flowers. <br />• Purchase of land or easements. <br />• Major soil purchases, grade changes or construction. <br />• Work on state land. <br />• Capital expenditures (items with a unit cost of $5,000 or more), such as buildings, motor <br />vehicles, trails, or other permanent structures. <br />• Purchase of meals or snacks for volunteers. <br />• Experimental practices not approved by DNR. <br />Questions about additional eligible or ineligible expenses can be directed to ucf.dnr@state.mn.us. <br />Project Evaluation <br />Projects will be evaluated on serving underserved populations as identified in the rubric. <br />Examples of underserved populations include, but are not limited to, individuals living in areas with <br />high exposure to negative environmental conditions, who are low-income, persons with disabilities, <br />individuals with less than a high school education, those with limited English proficiency, populations <br />experiencing low life expectancy, older adults, veterans, and persons of color. Negative environmental <br />conditions may include high air pollution (Particulate Matter 2.5), and low tree canopy coverage (less <br />than 30%). The applicant must provide a detailed description of the underserved populations served <br />by the proposed project and the measurable benefits to those populations as outlined in the rubric. <br />For resources to help identify underserved populations in your communities, please refer to the <br />Underserved Communities Resource List. <br />The commitment to underserved communities aligns with the State of Minnesota's policy of ensuring fairness, precision, <br />equity, and consistency in competitive grant awards. This includes implementing diversity and inclusion in grant making. <br />The Policy on Rating Criteria for Competitive Grant Review establishes the expectation that grant programs intentionally <br />identify how the grant serves diverse populations, especially populations experiencing inequities or disparities, or both. <br />Competitive Grant Review establishes the expectation that grant programs intentionally identify how the grant serves <br />diverse populations, especially populations experiencing inequities or disparities, or both. <br />In addition to criteria listed above, applications will be reviewed and scored based on the overall <br />strength of the proposal. This evaluation serves three purposes: <br />• To help ensure the quality of the projects receiving taxpayer dollars <br />• To distinguish among high -scoring projects if funding is insufficient to support all that meet <br />application requirements <br />• To rank remaining projects if funding allows <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.