Laserfiche WebLink
Acting Chair Sis commented that it appears there is a difference between what commercial/assisted <br />living and industrial properties are charged for Park Dedication. <br />Commissioner Bennett commented that there is not enough time to gather more details and provide <br />a specific recommendation to the Council given the timeline for this discussion. He stated that he <br />would not be comfortable providing a percentage of increase but would feel comfortable providing <br />a recommendation to the Council to potentially increase the fees in line with the other development <br />costs as they see fit. <br />Acting Chair Sis stated that he could support three to five percent as an increase to keep in line <br />with inflation, as there was no increase made last year. He noted that this is a recommendation, <br />and the Council would make the ultimate decision. <br />Commissioner Olson stated that he could support an increase between three and five percent to <br />ensure there is sufficient funding for the proposed community amenities in the park system. <br />Acting Chair Sis asked Councilmember Musgrove for input on the appetite of the Council for a <br />single digit increase. <br />Councilmember Musgrove commented that a single digit increase would be better. She stated that <br />the Lower Rum River Water Management Organization (LRRWMO) is increasing its fees in <br />response to not increasing fees for a period of time and if therefore playing catch up. She stated <br />that it is harder on developers to have large increases and therefore incremental fees are easier. <br />She stated that the fees need to be connected to the needs. <br />Parks & Assistant Public Works Director Riverblood commented that within the capital <br />improvement program, there are approximately $30,000,000 of projects included and the <br />community center has been included with an approximate cost of $20,000,000, in addition to that <br />overall cost. He noted that an index of $50,000,000 can be linked to an increase in development <br />fees. He stated that there is a demand, and projects proposed within the parks and trails plan that <br />will always out -strip the available Park Dedication fees. <br />Acting Chair Sis asked if the Commission would be comfortable with four percent for an increase. <br />Commissioner Bennett commented that he would not feel comfortable with an arbitrary <br />percentage. He stated that these are developer -paid costs, but those are passed on to consumers. <br />He stated that he would feel more comfortable supporting an increase if there were some type of <br />funding gap identified. <br />Acting Chair Sis clarified that this would be an increase of 4.5 percent to the Park Dedication fee <br />and not the overall project cost. <br />Commissioner Bennett commented that he has difficulty supporting an arbitrary increase if it is <br />not linked to a funding gap. <br />Park and Recreation Commission/ October 10, 2024 <br />Page 4 of 6 <br />