My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Environmental Policy Board - 03/05/2007
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Environmental Policy Board
>
2007
>
Agenda - Environmental Policy Board - 03/05/2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 12:26:45 PM
Creation date
3/12/2007 9:35:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Environmental Policy Board
Document Date
03/05/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
47
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Coordinator Anderson stated that prior to the Ramsey3 presentation, there will be a meet and <br />greet for the advisory boards. He stated that attendance isn't required, but the EPB members <br />may want to be represented at that meeting. <br /> <br />Board Member Sibilski asked if members could meet at 6:00 p.m. <br /> <br />Chairperson McDilda suggested leaving things open ended. He stated that once the file is e- <br />mailed to EPB members, they can keep in touch about a specific time to meet to discuss the draft <br />report. <br /> <br />Case #4: <br /> <br />Consider Draft Ordinance #07-02-_to Establish a Tree Bank <br /> <br />Coordinator Anderson presented a draft ordinance amending Section 9.24.04 (Private Trees in <br />New Development Areas) of the Ramsey City Code. He stated that originally the suggestion to <br />establish a Tree Bank came from a task force member. <br /> <br />Chairperson McDilda recalled that member to be Margaret Connolly. <br /> <br />Coordinator Anderson explained that the Tree Bank was intended to help capture trees that <br />would be lost after a development. He stated this is a draft ordinance to amend the tree <br />preservation section of code to establish tree retention thresholds for multi-family developments <br />and commercial developments. He stated that if a development is going to exceed the threshold, <br />for every inch over the threshold, they have to either payor replant above and beyond the <br />required landscaping. He stated money can be taken in to build up a fund used for tree related <br />expenses, and as incentive to try to retain what is on a site if it is worthwhile. <br /> <br />Board Member Max stated that delineating all areas located within a 100 year flood plain will <br />absorb and calculate the amount of storm water that gets absorbed as opposed to flushing down <br />into the ponds or the Rum River and Mississippi River. He suggested identifying the cost of <br />building or maintaining a stormwater treatment facility. He stated there is a climate exchange in <br />Chicago that trades in carbon sequestration and particular matter filtration. He stated there are <br />companies who plant trees so that they can abate somebody else's pollution. He stated the <br />values are widely accepted. <br /> <br />Coordinator Anderson stated that the ordinance is preliminary and needs to be reviewed by the <br />engineering and planning staff. <br /> <br />Chairperson McDilda commended Coordinator Anderson for taking the time to put together a <br />great ordinance. <br /> <br />Board Member Bentz asked about exemption from federal and state monies for building new <br />roads. <br /> <br />Coordinator Anderson stated that a lot of this will come into play with City Code. There will <br />have to be some leeway. In the case of a standard residential road where there is a main collector <br />street that requires right-of-way, it makes sense to have the exemption written in the code. He <br />explained that the exemption would also apply to trails that are required by code. <br /> <br />Environmental Policy Board! February 5, 2007 <br />Page 11 of 13 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.