My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 03/13/2026
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Parks and Recreation Commission
>
2026
>
Agenda - Parks and Recreation Commission - 03/13/2026
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
10/16/2026 1:29:20 PM
Creation date
9/30/2026 12:47:49 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Parks and Recreation Commission
Document Date
03/13/2026
Supplemental fields
Date
3/13/2025
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
206
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
5. 1. <br />Park and Recreation Commission <br />Meeting Date: 03/12/2026 <br />Primary Strategic Plan Initiative: Address infrastructure needs. <br />Information <br />Title: <br />Playground Replacement Program 2026 — Riverdale Park <br />Purpose/Background: <br />Late in 2021, City Council approved the Playground Replacement Policy which informs the city generally on <br />which playgrounds are to be replaced and when. In 2022, the city removed two small antiquated play structures <br />that did not merit replacement, and refurbished the playgrounds at both Peltzer and Rabbit Park's pursuant to the <br />policy and plan. Between 2023 and 2024 the playground at River's Bend was refurbished and Alpine Park's was <br />replaced and greatly expanded. In 2025, Central Park was also replaced with a significant expansion in scope and <br />play components at a cost of $449,000 <br />In summary, the city remains on track in replacing one playground each year, consistent with the policy. As part <br />of the approval of the 2026-2035 Capital Improvement Plan, the estimated cost of the annual playground <br />replacements rose from $100k to an estimated $125k. This target amount was an estimate for the 2026 <br />playground replacement —and the RFP process was understood to determine if $125k would be adequate for the <br />near -term years of the CIP. <br />As the 2026 CIP project page outlines, each of the playgrounds at Solstice, Flintwood Terrace and Riverdale <br />Parks are considered 'due' for replacement. Staff conducted an analysis and comparisons of all three, and found <br />that Flintwood Terrace and Riverdale Park merit replacement more so than Solstice Park. Based upon a <br />significant number of playground patrons at Riverdale Park over Flintwood Terrace, at the January regular <br />meeting, the Commission directed staff to focus on Riverdale Park this year —with the development of a Request <br />for Proposals, and thus the subject of this March case. <br />Notification: <br />The Public Hearing on the 2026-2035 city-wide Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) conducted in December 2025, <br />included the 2026 playground replacement this case discusses. <br />Time Frame/Observations/Alternatives: <br />The 2026 RFP (first attachment) was issued to fourteen playground vendors and six proposals were received by <br />the due date. As referenced above, issuance of the RFP was to evaluate if $125k would be adequate for a <br />complete playground replacement in 2026. Additionally, park department staff were very interested in seeing if <br />this project could move the city away from Engineered Wood Fiber (EWF or wood chips) for fall zone resilient <br />surfacing, and to Poured -in -Place (PIP) fall zone surfacing. Accordingly, the RFP invited playground vendors to <br />submit two distinct proposals: "Proposal A shall be Engineered Wood Fiber mulch with poured -in -place in select <br />areas at a not -to -exceed amount of $125,000. Proposal B shall be Poured -in -Place throughout the entire play area <br />at a not -to -exceed amount of $230,000." Parks Lead, Andy Blood will be present for the meeting to speak to the <br />maintenance aspects and benefits of PIP versus EWF as needed. <br />A panel of three staff evaluated the proposals for consistency with the RFP and the two Addenda that were issued <br />before the RFP due date. The three judge panel identified each submittal from the playground vendors, finding <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.