Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Heineman, Councilmembers Buscher, Olson, Peters, Riley, <br />Specht, and Stewart. Voting No: None. <br /> <br />Council Business <br /> <br />Councilmember Buscher asked how Council could approve the remaining assessments while <br />temporarily excluding the Hodgman property. <br /> <br />City Attorney Johnson explained that Council could approve the certification list minus the <br />identified property. Doing so would not forgive or eliminate the outstanding charge; Council <br />would eventually need to provide additional direction on how to resolve the account. <br /> <br />Council discussed whether an appliance, plumbing fixture, meter issue, or another condition could <br />explain the extraordinary usage. <br /> <br />Staff explained that the water meter was located inside the residence and measured water flowing <br />through the meter. <br /> <br />Council acknowledged the difficulty of reconciling the meter reading with the lack of physical <br />evidence associated with such a substantial amount of water. <br /> <br />Councilmember Specht initially proposed approving Resolution #26-214 while writing off the <br />disputed bill for the Hodgman property. The motion failed for lack of a second. <br /> <br />Councilmember Olson suggested another potential resolution: charge the household an amount <br />equivalent to its second-highest water bill for the year rather than eliminating the charge. <br /> <br />Council noted that the necessary amount was not immediately available. <br /> <br />Motion by Councilmember Buscher, seconded by Councilmember Olson, to adopt Resolution #26- <br />214 adopting assessments for past-due municipal utility bills and current services rendered, <br />excluding the property at 5540 144th Avenue NW from the certification list pending further review <br />and directing staff to return to Council with follow-up within one month. <br /> <br />Mayor Heineman reiterated that excluding the property would allow additional time to review the <br />circumstances without questioning the work City staff had already completed. He supported <br />further discussion because of the unusual size and unexplained nature of the reported consumption. <br /> <br />Motion carried. Voting Yes: Mayor Heineman, Councilmembers Buscher, Olson, Peters, Riley, <br />and Stewart. Voting No: Specht. <br /> <br />7. COUNCIL BUSINESS <br />7.01: Adopt Resolution 26-215 Adopting Proposed 2027 Payable Tax Levies (General, <br />Pavement Management, EDA and Debt Service) & Schedule Public Hearings for December <br />City Council /September 22, 2026 <br />Page 6 of 10 <br /> <br />