Laserfiche WebLink
7. 2. <br />CC Regular Session <br />Meeting Date: <br />10/13/2026 <br />Primary Strategic Plan Initiative: Address infrastructure needs. <br />Title: <br />Introduce Ordinance #26-18 Amending Chapter 117 (Subdivision Code) Pertaining to Streets. <br />Purpose/Background: <br />During the discussion of the Rum River Retreat plat, it was clear that provisions in Chapter 117 (Subdivision Code) created <br />confusion. Section 117-614(c)(7) notes that the maximum length of cul-de-sac streets is limited to 600 feet, though two <br />other provisions ((b)(2) and (c)(11)) require extending streets to serve other properties. This leads to confusion as to what is <br />considered a true permanent cul-de-sac and what is a future through street with a temporary cul-de-sac turnaround. <br />Ramsey has several roadways that exceed this length and only a few of them actually received variances when their plats <br />were reviewed. Sapphire Street in Williams Woods, north of 175th Avenue, is a recent example, but not all "permanent" cul- <br />de-sacs have received variances. Attached to this report is a map identifying all the dead-end streets and clusters of streets <br />that have a single -access point exceeding 600 feet in length (individual or combined length, respectively). The map also <br />identifies streets that are considered permanent (standalone) and those that could be extended into adjacent properties (stub), <br />should those properties develop. <br />Staff met and discussed the issue as it has historically been perceived as a public safety issue. Police noted that their concern <br />arises from having more than one way out of a neighborhood. The Fire Department noted that the Fire Code specifies street <br />lengths and widths in order to maneuver fire trucks as well as regulations on the number of access points for certain numbers <br />of units (sprinkled or unsprinkled). Furthermore, streets over 750 feet long are allowed when reviewed by the Fire <br />Marshall. It was agreed upon to bring forward a Code Amendment that simply strikes the 600-foot language while inserting <br />references to the Fire Code. Chief Winkle was at the Planning Commission meeting and described the Fire Department's <br />operational needs in greater detail. <br />All plats will be reviewed for reasonableness while balancing property owner's rights (both developing properties and <br />adjacent properties). Sticking firm to a 600-foot limit, even in a temporary situation, and not providing neighboring <br />properties access could be seen as a taking of their development rights. <br />A larger -scale revamp of the Subdivision Code is expected over the winter months. <br />Notification: <br />A public hearing notice was placed in the September 11 Anoka Union -Herald Newspaper. Amendments to the Subdivision <br />Code are not required to have a public hearing. <br />Funding Source: <br />Costs associated with this work are a part of staffs duties. <br />Recommendation: <br />At its September 24, 2026, meeting, the Planning Commission unanimously recommended approval of the proposed Code <br />Amendment. <br />Outcome/Action: <br />Motion to introduce Ordinance #26-18 amending Chapter 117 (Subdivision Code) pertaining to Streets. <br />Roll Call Vote <br />Attachments <br />Ordinance #26-18 <br />Map <br />Email from Paul Olson <br />