Laserfiche WebLink
Mayor Heineman clarified that the intended adjustment was to reduce only the $1,202.27 water <br />portion to $236.02, the highest other water charge incurred by the property during the preceding <br />year. Other components of the utility bill would remain. <br />Councihnembers expressed agreement with that approach as a fair compromise based on the <br />property's historical usage. <br />City Administrator Hagen indicated that Finance would calculate the revised amount due and <br />clarify any payments already made. He also suggested bringing back a resolution to re -certify the <br />adjusted assessment, with the existing mid -November payment deadline and associated penalty - <br />waiver provisions continuing to apply. <br />2.04: 2050 Comprehensive Plan Update — System Statement Discussion <br />Planning Manager Larson presented the Metropolitan Council system statement and its role in <br />developing Ramsey's 2050 Comprehensive Plan. He outlined projections of approximately 1,400 <br />additional households by 2040 and another 1,400 by 2050, together with approximately 1,000 <br />additional jobs followed by 1,300 more jobs. These projections inform regional planning for <br />wastewater capacity, transit service, and the placement of future development. He discussed the <br />suburban -edge density expectation of approximately 3.5 units per acre within the applicable <br />service area and stated that the City has sufficient land to accommodate its anticipated growth. <br />Planning Manager Larson explained that the existing comprehensive plan remains generally sound <br />but that its land -use map requires several corrections. Larger lots along the Rum and Mississippi <br />Rivers should reflect historic development patterns and natural -resource protections. The map also <br />shows one mixed -use category, although the plan text describes low-, medium-, and high -intensity <br />mixed use. As a result, some areas receive credit for only the lowest density even when they <br />develop more intensively. He suggested clarifying these categories and adjusting the dividing line <br />between medium- and high -density residential guidance from eight to 12 units per acre to better <br />match actual development. <br />The Council asked whether a proposed approximately 35-acre rural subdivision with roughly 18 <br />homesites would work against the density goal. <br />Planning Manager Larson explained that the property is outside the Metropolitan Urban Service <br />Area and is not counted in the same manner as serviced urban land. Such rural development must <br />still support wells and septic systems and comply with applicable separation and groundwater - <br />protection requirements. <br />The Council also asked about an isolated darker -yellow residential designation within a largely <br />rural area. <br />Planning Manager Larson explained that past development decisions resulted in that area receiving <br />municipal sewer and water, and that urban land -use guidance generally follows the availability or <br />feasible extension of those utilities. <br />City Council Work Session / October 13, 2026 <br />Page 3 of 7 <br />