Laserfiche WebLink
<br />7. That the Applicants own the adj acent parcels to the northeast and east; and they currently <br />reside on the adja~ent parcel to the northeast. <br /> <br />8. That the Applicants are proposing to dedicate a private access easement across their existing <br />parcels to the northeast and east to provide access to the Subject Property from County Road <br />#64 (181" Avenue N.W.). <br /> <br />9. That there are no maximum front yard setbacks in the R -1 Rural Developing Residential <br />District and that currently there are private driveways in the community that exceed 315 feet <br />in length (the distance between County Road #64 and the front line of the Subject Property). <br /> <br />10. That the proposed development o.f the Subject Propelty with a private access easement in <br />excess of 300 feet in length does not present any unique circumstances that would cause <br />concern for providing emergency services to the Subject Property. <br /> <br />11. That the Subject Property is landlocked and has no frontage on a public road and the literal <br />interpretation of City Code Section 9.11.01 would prohibit the development of a single <br />family dwelling on the Subject Property, which significantly exceeds the minimum lot size of <br />2.5 acres, and therein deprives tlle Applicants of rights commonly enjoyed by other properties <br />in the same district, resulting in an undue hardship. <br /> <br />12. That the City has previously granted similar variances. <br /> <br />13. That the variance requested is the minimum variance which would alleviate the hardship. <br /> <br />14. That the speciallandIocked conditions do not result from the actions of the Applicant. <br /> <br />15. That if granted, the variance wilVwill not permit a use that is prohibited in the R-l Rural <br />Residential District. <br /> <br />16. That the granting of the variance will/will not grant the Applicant any special privileges that <br />are denied by this Chapter to other owners of land in the same district. <br /> <br />17. That if granted, the variance wilVwill not impair an adequate supply of light and air to <br />adjacent property. <br /> <br />18. That if granted, the variance will not be materially detrimental to the purposes of this Chapter <br />or other property in the same zone. <br /> <br />19. That if granted, the variance WilVwill not increase the danger of fire, or endanger the public <br />safety. <br /> <br />20. That if granted, the variance wilVwill not unreasonably diminish property values within the <br />neighborhood. <br /> <br />RESOLUTION #07-03-_ <br />Page 2 of3 <br /> <br />17 <br />