Laserfiche WebLink
<br />. <br /> <br />. <br /> <br />the Council packet. The revised elevations show the brick and shakes wrapped around the sides <br />of the building as requested by staff; however, staff continues to have some concerns about the <br />dominance of the garage doors. The applicant has stated that many different. building <br />layouts/plans have been reviewed. and that this plan is needed to provide one-level living and <br />meet the desired price 'point. Ms. Geisler stated staff is looking for direction from Council' <br />regarding whether or not the most recent elevations are adequate; if not, what other specific <br />changes are desired by Council. <br /> <br />Associate Planner Geisler 'stated the Planning Commission review~d the preliminary plat and .site <br />plan at their September 7, 2006 meeting. The Commission recommended denial of the <br />Comprehensive Plan Amendment and Rezoning requests, but did want to provide comments on <br />the plan and site plan in the event that the City Council is inclined to approve the plat. The <br />consensus of the Commissioners was that the current plan was an improvement over the previous <br />plan that showed 8 townhome units. Based on this, the Planning Commission recommended <br />approval of the preliminary plat and site plan, with further review of density transitioning <br />requirements for the site. <br /> <br />Acting Mayor Elvig. noted staff recommends moving forward with this, and the Planning <br />Commission recommended denial based on there being no compelling reason to use it as a <br />bnffer. <br /> <br />Councilmember Look questioned amending the Comprehensive Plan for this project, as the <br />Comprehensive Plan will be changed in 2008. <br /> <br />Community Development Director Trudgeon explained the Comprehensive Plan will look at all <br />the parcels in the City, although it may not go into the detail of a lot this small. There is a public <br />participation process with the Comprehensive Plan and the property owners have the ability to <br />come forward and state their wishes. Council can decide what they choose to do; this rezoning <br />would amend the 200 I Comprehensive Plan that shows the property as a commercial use. <br /> <br />Councilmember Dehen inquired about the opposition among the neighbors for putting this <br />housing in. <br /> <br />Acting Mayor Elvig stated there were a couple of neighbors that spoke against the housing, <br />feeling as though it may be less valuable than some of the houses along the river. There was <br />contest to that, and whether the homes up the road were of like and similar values. The position <br />of the neighbors that spoke was that it may take the value of their neighborhood down. <br /> <br />Councilmember Dehen questioned what the neighborhood can rely on for future development if <br />they cannot rely on a blueprint such as the Comprehensive Plan, and that anyone can come to the <br />Council with a request for a Comprehensive Plan Amendment to do what they want. <br /> <br />Acting Mayor Elvig explained no one can automatically receive a Comprehensive Plan <br />Amendment; anyone can ask. The Council has been discussing that this is a very difficult piece <br />of property to do anything with. It has been on the market for years as commercial and no one <br />. has picked it up, and it does not work well for single family lots. The other side of this is that <br /> <br />City Council I Jannary 9, 2007 <br />Page 13 of 24 <br /> <br />P51 <br />