My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Agenda - Council - 04/10/2007
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Agendas
>
Council
>
2007
>
Agenda - Council - 04/10/2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 11:17:54 AM
Creation date
4/6/2007 10:24:07 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Agenda
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
04/10/2007
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
276
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />the surface up, with the building that is set forward possibly being a different color. He stated <br />part of the challenge of this Council is to put land to the best use, and this is likely the best use of <br />the land here, <br /> <br />Consensus of the Council (with Councilmembers Dehen and Look having expressed opposition <br />to the project) was as follows regarding additional revisions to the elevations: <br />. Staggering of the buildings as included in page no. 9 of the Council packet (marked as 2nd <br />Submittal) <br />. Staggering should include the roofline, with the <br />different buildings <br />. Landscaping between and around the build' <br />. Eliminate outside storage <br /> <br />Councilmember Dehen stated he would like to <br />the garbage dispensf?rs. <br /> <br /> <br />Mr. Murphy indicated the garages will likely be in <br />19' size that is seen in most projects. <br /> <br />Associate Planner DaInes indicated the p <br />for this project will be included on an A <br /> <br />sive Plan Amendment <br /> <br />CBR Development Sketch PIa <br /> <br />itted a sketch plan application to <br />'[ Nowthen Boulevard and north of <br />. se constructed in the late 1800s, The <br />a1 proposal attached townhome units, based on the <br />density, rezoning to R-2,road configuration and access, <br />. ghborhood, Ms. DaInes stated the site is 1.9 acres, <br />configuration and access, and compatibility with <br />ed the site is 1.9 acres, and the proposed density <br />g concerns of staff with the revised proposal: <br />ically, at Ie one public street IS requrreG through-all <br />treet is proposed. <br />e homes are proposed <br /> <br />d, City Code limits the use f hammer-head road <br />t. This is proposed to be approximately 2 <br />s required. <br />4) Coun rO . Anoka County submitted comments regarding this de ment, <br />stating that th~roposed access does not meet access spacing guideline (from Sun <br />Drive) and that turn lane construction would be required. <br /> <br /> <br /> <br />City Council Work Session I March 20, 2007 <br />Page 9 of13 <br /> <br />-121- <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.