Laserfiche WebLink
Tax Increment Bonds ($2,600,000 original amount, final maturity 2/1/10 paid from 2009 <br />increment), and several pay-as-you-go agreements with local developers/owners. Annual <br />projected surplus from the district should vary from approximately $90,000 to $183,000 <br />through the year 2009. There are no identified expenditures from the district during the <br />last three years of its maximum duration. This district appears to be financially healthy <br />and cumulative fund balances of the district are projected to become substantial over the <br />life of the district. He explained that such balances must be used to pay for TIF eligible <br />costs specified in the TIF plan budget, be used to prepay or defease outstanding bonds of <br />the district, be remitted back to the County for redistribution, or be used for some <br />combination of items 1-3. If increments are used to pay for additional expenditures either <br />inside or outside of the district, an amendment to the TIF plan budget will be necessary. <br />City staff will need to monitor and examine the adequacy of the current budget over time <br />to meet all past and future tax increment expenditures from the district. Should the <br />budget need to be expanded or modified, a TIF plan amendment will need to be approved <br />which requires various notifications and a public hearing. <br /> <br />TIF District No. 3 was approved in May 1987, as an "economic development" TIF <br />district and was located in Municipal District No. 2 (a small area in the northern part of <br />the City). The district was decertified in 1997, after remaining in existence its maximum <br />duration. The fund balance was ($36,655) as of December 31, 1997. City staff has <br />indicated that this deficit balance has or will be eliminated by transferring EDA and/or <br />PIR funds which include interest and administrative fees taken from the district in past <br />years. <br /> <br />Councilmember Haas Steffen asked staff to find out why there was a negative fund <br />balance in District//3. <br /> <br />Mr. Winkelhake stated that TIF District No. 4 (Front Street) was approved in August <br />1987, as a "redevelopment" TIF district. The district may remain in existence through the <br />year 2013, at which time it must be decertified. The district currently contains 63 parcels <br />of property, consisting of a combination of commercial/industrial and residential <br />properties. A request for district certification occurred on May 2, 1998, and as such, the <br />district has a frozen tax rate of 91.649%. The projected cash flow schedule for the district <br />and the projected annual tax increment of approximately $106,000 are for taxes payable <br />in 1999 and beyond. Other revenues from the district include projected tax increment <br />and/or deficiency payments from the Comfort Inn project beginning in the year 2000, and <br />a deficiency payment in 1998 from the Ramsey Sports Center project. Current <br />obligations of the district include debt service on the 1989B G.O. Tax Increment Bonds <br />($235,000 original amount, final maturity 2/1/99 paid from 1998 increment), and several <br />pay-as-you-go agreements with local developers/owners. Annual projected surplus from <br />the district vary from approximately $88,000 - $146,000 through the year 2009. There <br />are currently no identified expenditures from the district during the last four years of its <br />maximum duration. As is the case with the other districts, Mr. Winkelhake stated that <br />District No. 4 also appears financially healthy. Such balances can be used to pay the <br />items as listed for Districts #1 and #2. City staff will also need to monitor this district <br /> <br /> Council Work Session/May 19, 1998 <br /> Page 4 of 10 <br /> <br /> <br />