My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Planning Commission - 02/01/2007
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Planning Commission
>
2007
>
Minutes - Planning Commission - 02/01/2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 3:49:42 PM
Creation date
4/13/2007 11:32:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
02/01/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Iodine Street N.W. The subject property is approximately 1.7 acres in size and is zoned Rw2 <br />Medium Density Residential, which allows up to 7 units per acre. The plat is proposing 9 <br />attached units, with 2 additional outlots to be re-platted at a later date. Ms. DaInes advised the <br />plat proposes access off of CR 5 (Nowthen Boulevard). Helium Street is indicated as a public <br />street, with a service road right-of-way of 45 feet instead of the typical 60 feet. The pavement <br />width is proposed to be the standard 24 feet. Staff is comfortable with the reduced right-of-way <br />because the proposed Helium Street right-of-way is adjacent to existing right-of-way for the <br />cowty road. The plan for access is the same as originally proposed in the GAD's Prairie <br />development. This plan poses the similar access constraints. However, Helium Street terminates <br />in a temporary cul-de-sac that may be extended at a later date. Staff believes turn lane <br />construction will be required with a bylass lane north-bound on Nowthen Boulevard by Anoka <br />County. <br /> <br />Associate Plamler Dalnes indicated staff is requesting additional landscaping in the green space <br />between CR 5 and Helium Street to mitigate any potential conflicts with vehicular headlights. <br />The proposed drainage plan is problematic and staff has requested ~ alternative plan for <br />providing an outlet for stormwater runoff. Also, the utility plan needs revisions to indicate the <br />extension of laterals under Helium Street. The proposed plat does not indicate a sidewalk on <br />Helium Street, and this is generally acceptable to staff due to the requirement to construct a <br />bituminous trail along Nowthen Blvd. N.W. A portion of the trail is located within the right-of- <br />way on the northern portion on the site. It is standard practice to require trails within the <br />boundaries of the development; however, due to the site constraints it is staffs opinion that it is <br />reasonable to allow a portion of the trail within the Helium Street right-of-way. <br /> <br />Associate Planner DaInes advised building elevations have been submitted and are generally <br />acceptable to staff. It appears that the units will meet the R-2: Medium Density Residential <br />architectural standards of natural stone and architectural elements. Color palettes have been <br />requested and have not been submitted at this time. City Code requires 40% open space, of <br />which 10% must be identifiable community gathering space. Revisions have been requested <br />regarding the location of the community open space. Ms. DaInes stated a Landscape and Tree <br />Preservation Plan have been submitted. Staff is requesting that an effort be made to satisfy the <br />density transitioning requirements through the preservation of additional trees. <br /> <br />Citizen Input <br /> <br />Mr. Ben Deemer, 14501 Sunfish Lake Boulevard, stated he used to own the property adjacent to <br />this. It was addressed in the last developer's plat that by running Helium Street north along the <br />east property line, opposing southbound traffic on CR 5 would be a safety hazard with the <br />opposing head lights at night. Mr. Deemer stated the name of the street seems to indicate it is <br />intended to extend north to connect with the existing Helium Street, which lines up with the rear <br />property line of all of these parcels. It would be better planning to run this street to the back <br />property line to connect with the other Helium Street. Creating a city street of such an alignment <br />is poor planning, and if it is intended to extend north through the three parcels and connect to CR <br />5 this could be considered a taking. He would also like to point out that the adjacent property <br />was previously prevented from developing by a moratorium in the City for more than three years <br /> <br />Planning Commission/ February 1, 2007 <br />Page 3 of12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.