My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Planning Commission - 02/01/2007
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Planning Commission
>
2007
>
Minutes - Planning Commission - 02/01/2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/19/2025 3:49:42 PM
Creation date
4/13/2007 11:32:40 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Planning Commission
Document Date
02/01/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
12
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />make the change in the future to take away from the other property owners. He does not know <br />who has suggested this new plan, and they have not had any contact. He would appreciate some <br />contact. <br /> <br />Mr. Tim Eggerichs, Hakanson Anderson Associates, Inc., representing the applicant, stated the <br />road alignment was based on staffs recommendation. <br /> <br />Commissioner Van Scoy inquired about a response from the County. <br /> <br />Associate Planner DaInes replied she spoke with the Highway Department about 1 1Iz weeks ago <br />and was told they would submit comments prior to this meeting. There were no concerns <br />expressed at that time, but she is not certain if the plat had been reviewed. The County did not <br />provide comments on the previous plat submitted for this property that was considered in June. <br /> <br />Commissioner Van Scoy observed this plat does impact the other lots, which have access off of <br />CR 5. He questioned if an assumption is being made that the County will make changes to the <br />access. <br /> <br />Associate Planner DaInes replied the County would prefer to see one access instead of three, so if <br />the properties to the north ever develop it would likely be seen as an advantage from that point of <br />view. However, staff cannot anticipate any of the other comments of the County, other than <br />perhaps turn lane construction at the proposed Helium extension. <br /> <br />Commissioner Van Scoy questioned if there will be adequate room for the proposed turn lanes. <br /> <br />City Engineer Jankowski indicated there should be enough space to put in both left and right turn <br />lanes at Helium Street; it has been done within the same amount of right-of-way elsewhere on <br />CR 5. The other issue the County will likely conunent on is in relation to the County's access <br />spacing guidelines. The access as proposed is approximately 500 feet from 146th Avenue, and is <br />approximately 900 feet from Iodine Street to the south. The County's guidelines are 1/8 mile, <br />which would be 660 feet. This appears to be able to meet those guidelines; they would wait to <br />hear whether the County would grant grace on that 160 feet. <br /> <br />Commissioner Van Seo}' inquired about the potential for widening CR 5 and the impact this <br />might have on that. <br /> <br />City Engineer Jankowski replied there are 120 feet of right-of-way; there should be sufficient <br />space to go to four lanes with turn lanes. <br /> <br />Commissioner Trites Rolle asked if this development is intended to be for sale units, and would <br />not include rental. <br /> <br />Mr. Eggerichs replied he is not certain; there will be an association. <br /> <br />Planning Commissionl February 1,2007 <br />Page 5 of 12 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.