Laserfiche WebLink
25% growth anyway. Mr. Zitzloff stated he is confused about how the technical school will be <br />able to accommodate their proposed building and anticipated growth of 25% in 25 years. Hc <br />stated another problem is that the technical school is very unsure what they will do and may not <br />know until the year 2000. Mr. Zitzloff stated he does not know what to do since he has invested <br />a lot of money in purchasing this property. He commented on the other projects he has <br />developed in various communities and offered to provide references. <br /> <br />Mayor Gamec explained that the City is in the same situation. He stated that he is not <br />questioning that Mr. Zitzloff's project wouldn't be very nice but there is a problem. He <br />explained the timing for the technical school to bond for financing and prepare this project and, <br />in the mean time, the City does not want a business to locate in a way that prevents their <br />construction. <br /> <br />Mr. Zitzloff stated if the technical school is planning a 25-year project and estimate a need for <br />25% expansion, they do not have enough land at this site to accommodate that size of building <br />and expansion. He commented that the technical school may have an alternate site but it appears <br />they still have many questions and unresolved issues. <br /> <br />Councilmember Haas Steffen reviewed the language of the proposed ordinance regarding the <br />term of the moratorium and opportunity for an extension. She suggested that Mr. Zitzloffjoin <br />the City when they make their argument that if the school was expanded there is no place for a <br />parking lot on the north side of the railroad tracks. She explained the idea of the Northstar <br />Corridor Study is to keep traffic off T.H. #10 and there is no corridor to allow that except for <br />C.R. #116. Councilmember Haas Steffen stated it appears there is not enough room available for <br />the technical school to expand as they are anticipating. She commented on the presence of two <br />moratoriums, should this one be adopted, and pointed out that there are businesses located on this <br />property. Councilmember Haas Steffen reviewed the process which was followed with the <br />moratorium and stated that she will vote against the moratorium tonight. <br /> <br />City Administrator Norman explained that as the technical school expansion proposal moves <br />along, the concerns expressed by Mr. Zitzloff have become apparent. He explained that after a <br />lengthy review of their proposal, the City was asked to place the moratorium since the technical <br />school expansion may place a newly constructed business in a position of being condemned by <br />the State and removed. Mr. Norman stated that Mr. Kurkowski asked the City to consider this <br />moratorium. He stated the six-month time period would probably be adequate to address the site <br />selection issues. <br /> <br />Mr. Zitzloff stated that he could live with the six-month time period but he is concerned that Mr. <br />Kurkowski could not provide any additional project or decision dates. He commented again on <br />the desire of the technical school to be able to accommodate anticipated growth and the inability <br />to do so on this site. Mr. Zitzloff stated he is also facing the situation where his current building <br />owner may find a new tenant once he learns of his interest to relocate to Ramsey. <br /> <br />Councilmember Haas Steffen explained that Mr. Kurkowski is uncertain because funding is <br />dependent on the State Legislature. <br /> <br />City Council/October 13, 1998 <br /> Page 13 of 22 <br /> <br /> <br />