Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Mayor Gamec indicated the City's legal counsel advised the City would not likely recoup the <br />cost of taking this on with Connexus. <br /> <br />Councilmember Elvig explained the City was hitting a stone wall trying to work through the <br />issue with Connexus. <br /> <br />Councilmember Dehen stated if the City were to show that Connexus was at least 50% negligent, <br />the negligent amount that is determined would be assessed by a potential jury. With a <br />determination of50% the City would recover $350,000 of the $700,000 in total damages. <br /> <br />Councilmember Strommen explained the $6,000 water bill and the $700,000 billing error have <br />been used as an example. The real issue is that they have come to the conclusion that these <br />incidents are systemic of a bigger problem, and that Connexus' level of service does not meet the <br />standard the City wants to give to the citizens. <br /> <br />Councilmember Dehen stated from his perspective, he understands there are some customer <br />service issues, but that has not been quantified. Secondly, is the question of how many people <br />are calling regarding utilities. <br /> <br />Finance Officer Lund indicated the major problem occurs at certification time. In September, <br />Council receives a listing of all the past due accounts; the majority of these are from people that <br />have moved out of their homes and the new people that have moved in receive those bills. These <br />past due accounts can be assessed to the property taxes. The new homeowners are likely tossing <br />the bills that are sent with the previous homeowner's name and do not realize the situation until <br />they receive a call from the City. With the service in-house the City could keep a better watch <br />on the final bill. <br /> <br />Councilmember Elvig stated he would be in support of pursuing a resolution to the $700,000 <br />billing error again, and also bringing the utility service in-house. <br /> <br />Councilmember Jeffrey suggested consideration of forming a consortium with other small <br />communities that may be suffering the same utility billing problems being experienced by <br />Ramsey. <br /> <br />2) Review of Current Sign Regulations <br /> <br />Removed from the agenda. <br /> <br />3) Concept Plan for Apartment Building in The Ponds <br /> <br />Associate Planner Daines stated Roger Fink of Trident Development, LLC is planning to submit <br />a formal site plan application for an apartment building on the lot within the Ponds subdivision. <br />The property is currently zoned R-3 high density housing, and was rezoned as part of the Ponds <br />rezoning request in February of 2002. The original intent of the property was to be developed <br />with approximately 60-70 units of senior housing. Ms. Daines stated Trident Development is <br />proposing a 63 unit, general occupancy, 3-story building on the Ponds property, which is <br /> <br />City Council Work Session / April 10, 2007 <br />Page 5 of9 <br />