Minutes - Planning Commission - 09/10/1998 - Special Workshop

Home

December. He stressed it was critical to obtain a favorable response. The Planning Commission is responsible for making a formal recommendation to City Council. He noted that they would submit for an extension with Metropolitan Council in case formal approval is delayed because of the holidays. Community Development Assistant Walther played excerpts from two videos, "The Future is Now" and "Preserving Rural Character," displaying two different perspectives with regard to planning. The Planning Commission reviewed a handout comparing conventional development planning with conservation-oriented development planning. Mr. Scheib gave a condensed presentation of the draft Comprehensive Plan, identifying the key issues. He noted that the housing development element needs to be addressed. Metropolitan Council's benchmark is 33-35% multi-family residential with the remainder single-family. The City's current goal is 10-90, multi-family vs. single-family. The consultants are suggesting getting closer to 30-70. Mr. Scheib advised that the sewer and water elements and the general implementation of public facilities would be available at the October workshop. The Planning Commission took a break from 8:40 to 8:47 p.m. Commissioner Jensen inquired about design criteria. Mr. Scheib stated this was not specifically addressed, however, the community identity element's framework goals provide direction. The identity element can be carded out with scenic roadways, and development will occur using the identity framework. An example is the Oak Savannahs subdivision in which natural resources is the identity of the area. The identity framework policy process will be implemented. Commissioner Jensen stated that denial or approval can be based on the Comprehensive Plan. Mr. Scheib affirmed this, stating that an ordinance has more "guts" than a policy, but at least it gives direction. Commissioner Deemer questioned the mixed residential density requirement in the urban area of 5 units per acre. Mr. Scheib explained this was indeed higher than R-I, and the purpose of increasing the density in this area is to meet Metropolitan Council objectives. It basically creates a more efficient and compact land use. Commissioner Deemer suggested there should be more density bonuses rather than starting out at a higher number. Mr. Scheib agreed it could be approached that way, but then the City must determine whether developers will be required to take the bonus or be allowed to develop at a lower density. Planning Commission/September 10, 1998 Page 2 of 4