Laserfiche WebLink
<br />~ <br /> <br />CITY COUNCIL WORK SESSION <br />Topic Report: Administrative Fines for <br />Minor Traffic Violations <br />By: James Way, Police Chief <br /> <br /> <br />Background: <br />Staff was requested by Councilmember Dehen to bring the topic of administrative fees for minor traffic <br />violations forward for discussion at work session. The issues identified for consideration ofthe use of <br />administrative fees are two fold; first, to capture the revenue that is currently collected by the state and the <br />county and secondly, to reduce the burden on congested court systems with regard to minor traffic violations. <br /> <br />Current Minnesota state law does not specifically allow or prohibit cities from utilizing administrative fines for <br />minor traffic violations. Because state statute does not specifically allow or prohibit the use of administrative <br />fines, there are very few cities that currently utilize this practice. Legislation has been introduced and is <br />currently being debated in the legislature to formally allow cities to utilize administrative fines under state <br />statute for specific traffic violations. The proposed legislation is attached for Council review. <br /> <br />Current Minnesota state statute allows cities to be credited with 2/3' s of the amount collected on traffic arrests if <br />the city provides prosecution, which Ramsey does. This can be a bit deceiving in that a traffic citation also <br />includes surcharges paid to the state and the county. For example: a $40 traffic citation includes a $72 <br />surcharge and a $3 library fee, bringing the total of the ticket to $115. The City would receive $28 of the $40 <br />citation and the state/county receives $87. <br /> <br />There are several factors that will need to be considered for the City of Ramsey to implement the use of <br />administrative fines for minor traffic violations. The City would need to develop a process for the <br />administration of the ticket and the collection of the fines. In addition, if fines are not paid, follow-up will be <br />. required to notify officers that an Anoka County citation will need to be issued and mailed to the violator. <br />Another factor to be considered is the loss in revenue that the State and the County will face. It is the League of <br />MN Cities position on the current legislative proposal that the administrative fines utilized by municipalities <br />would be issued only in circumstances where previously a warning would have been issued. The proposed <br />legislation limits the use of the administrative fine to a few minor offenses. This would prevent a loss in <br />revenue at the state or county level and therefore, limit the revenue that could potentially be gained by the <br />municipality. <br /> <br />One final area for consideration is that of officer discretion in the issuance of a traffic violation ticket. Under <br />current MN state law, the officer would have discretion in writing a municipal administrative fine or an Anoka <br />County citation. If the ticket is issued under the municipal administrative fine process, the ticket will not appear <br />on the driver's record. In cities that do not utilize the administrative fine process, a county citation would be <br />issued and the ticket would appear on the driver's record. In addition, an argument could be made that the city <br />is issuing tickets in an effort to increase revenue. <br /> <br />Staff has assembled considerable information on this topic and is prepared to discuss various issues related to <br />the consideration of implementing administmtive fines at the request of Council. <br /> <br />Action Statement: <br />Based on discussion. <br /> <br />CCWS: <br /> <br />05/01/2007 <br /> <br />";,.. <br />