Laserfiche WebLink
is a private easement and if Mr. Swanson receives the variance his property would have to adjust to <br />any public roads that eventually come through that property. <br />Board Member Hunt commented because that property is currently landlocked he gets the feeling <br />that Mr. Swanson is hoping whoever develops the rest of it will take care of the streets going into <br />that property if and when it gets developed. His question was that the layout shows Tiger Street <br />coming off from CR 64 and lining up close to Tiger Street below. <br />Assistant Community Development Director Frolik explained there does not have to be a through <br />street at Tiger if it is not a good point to access the County Road 64. <br />Mr. Swanson commented that Rabbit Street makes more sense because it continues north. <br />Board Member Trites Rolle asked if there are concerns with any safety issues from the City`s <br />standpoint.. <br />Assistant Community Development Director Frolik replied no. This has been reviewed with the <br />Fire Marshal and Fire Chief. There is not a maximum structure setback in the rural developing area <br />so there are many driveways that are on conforming lots that are much longer than this driveway <br />would be. Extra conditions are being put on this driveway and it is being treated like an access road <br />because of the variance application. <br />Board Member Cleveland asked whether the ingress/egress of this driveway will be shared by the <br />owner of the house Mr. Swanson is intending to sell so that there will be one driveway. <br />Mr. Swanson replied that is something he would have to work out with the County. <br />Board Member Cleveland requested clarification that the County decides how wide the driveway <br />entrance will be and the City determines what the driveway will look like. <br />Assistant Community Development Director Frolik explained the City would determine things like <br />the materials and the minimum clearance. <br />Mr. John Enstrom, 8702 181St Avenue, stated he owns the adjoining property which has 120 acres. <br />He is not against development in any shape, style or form; it is great. The City of Ramsey has <br />experienced a lot of growth in the last five years. The only thing he thinks they should be <br />addressing is quality growth. Any time you do business it should be good for all sides, not just one <br />sided, and this is totally one sided. Mr. Enstrom expressed his concerns about the following issues: <br />^ When he has approached Anoka County in the past they have asked that all property on the <br />south side of CR 64 would donate 60 foot easements in addition to the highway easement, <br />and they have done that on the property to the north. That is considered a major access <br />point to 169 and will be a through east/west street; it is the main street in Elk River. <br />^ He would like to see if the applicant is going to put a house there that it should be on a legal <br />street easement. <br />^ If the applicant just has an easement to his house and sells the property off to someone that <br />wants to develop it, it will be totally landlocked and they will be relying on him. He does <br />Board of Adjustment/Apri15, 2007 <br />Page 5 of 10 <br />