My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Minutes - Council - 04/24/2007
Ramsey
>
Public
>
Minutes
>
Council
>
2007
>
Minutes - Council - 04/24/2007
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/18/2025 2:33:02 PM
Creation date
5/10/2007 9:15:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Meetings
Meeting Document Type
Minutes
Meeting Type
Council
Document Date
04/24/2007
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Mr. Peterson replied the DNR does not have such standards. The DNR only regulates work that <br />is below the ordinary high water level of the wetland. Regarding the difference in delineation <br />and a functions and values analysis, the process of delineating a wetland is to determine that all <br />three of the wetland parameters are present and to define the boundaries of the wetland. <br />Functions and values is looking at that area and all the various functions a wetland would serve, <br />such as wildlife habitat and water quality. The methodology that is followed is MnRAM 3.0, <br />which does not require going to the level of determining the boundary. <br /> <br />Acting Mayor Elvig clarified the wetland quality determines the buffer width, which will take <br />place when a property is developed and the delineation line is determined. <br /> <br />Councilmember Dehen questioned if the wetland lines change through the process of succession. <br />He commented there are wetlands that are taken over by cattails and become uplands. <br /> <br />Mr. Peterson replied a totally pristine undisturbed wetland should remain the same. <br /> <br />Councilmember Dehen commented a very substantial part of Bunker Lake was open water when <br />he was young and succession has moved into that water area. <br /> <br />Acting Mayor Elvig indicated that is the whole reason to have a buffer. Pressure from <br />development starts to affect the wetland and you lose the lake and wetland. This buffer <br />minimizes the drainage and settlement that affects the wetlands. <br /> <br />Mr. Peterson stated more than likely what Councilmember Dehen is seeing is related to <br />urbanization. As areas get developed some of the water that would go into the water table gets <br />diverted, which will have impacts on wetland. <br /> <br />Councilmember Look stated what they are faced with in Ramsey is a problem more closely <br />associated with invasive species that literally move in and take over. There used to be open <br />water that is closed off. Mr. Peterson will say the runoff from phosphates and things of that <br />nature lead to the increased growth of this type of vegetation, but he does not know that science <br />backs that up. There is research that phosphate does not wash to the wetland to the rate that the <br />environmental community believes it does. The people of Ramsey need to understand that there <br />is not state or federal mandate for this buffering in terms of implementing an ordinance or an <br />official map of the wetlands, and it will have a direct impact on property owners. From that <br />standpoint he would hate to see this as an issue where property owners' rights are reduced and <br />incrementalized over time, and these various steps have been taken to make sure property values <br />are reduced. If the City wants to acquire property, that is up to the City decision making process. <br />Councilmember Look shared comments made by County Commissioner Earhart regarding <br />property owners being responsible for their property, rather than the hammer of government. <br /> <br />Mr. Peterson stated the functions of wetland buffers have been researched with grant money, and <br />that information will be coming out soon. There is nothing in the Ramsey's wetland buffer <br />ordinance that is contrary to that study information. There may be some communities that have <br />adopted buffer ordinances with much wider buffers that may be interested in the results. In the <br />past WPS has worked for a number of different cities on their buffer ordinances. They reviewed <br /> <br />City Council / April 24, 2007 <br />Page 19 of 38 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.