Laserfiche WebLink
<br />· The scope of required paving to be enforced, including the options of 15 to 21 feet and <br />100 feet <br />· Paving being. required on a determined length with problem properties tagged for <br />additional paving to be required . <br />.. Public purpose and aesthetic improvements associated with the paving requirement <br />· Possibility of a two pronged approach in identifying the problem properties and <br />launching a voluntary program . <br />· Incentive of the City paying for the first 21 feet of paving with the ability for the property <br />owner to have the remaining desired portion done and paid through assessments on the <br />tax roll <br />· Savings in City costs from reduced street sweeping and cleaning of the storm sewers <br /> <br />Chairperson Elvig suggested staff determine the number of driveways that would be involved <br />with this type of program. He suggested staff present the Committee with options for a program, <br />cost estimates and funding sources. <br /> <br />Public Works Director Olson indicated a driveway co~t can be determined by aerial photos. A <br />list will be prepared and incl~ded on the agenda of the next Committee meeting. <br /> <br />CounciImember Dehen suggested the possibility of an ordinance that would require the paving to <br />be completed by a certain date. He noted the City would not want to be involved with liability <br />issues associated with things such as utility lines being cut by the contractor. <br /> <br />Public Works Director Olson noted one option would be for the City to hire a contractor and run <br />an overall program as was done in Coon Rapids. Another option would be to offer property <br />owners payment for the cost to pave the required portion of the driveway. This option would <br />eliminate the City's involvement with waivers and liabilities. <br /> <br />Chairperson Elvig asked if there are any reasons currently that property owners are not required <br />to pave their driveways. <br /> <br />City Engineer Jankowski replied City Code requires driveways to be paved. <br /> <br />Chairperson Elvig questioned if secondary driveways that are currently class 5 would be required <br />to be paved. v <br /> <br />Public Works Supervisor Reimer noted dirt from those driveways runs onto the roads as well. <br />He pointed out there are also driveways with a negative slope. <br /> <br />Councilmember Dehen noted there are many ways for individuals to redirect water. <br /> <br />Motion by Chairperson Elvig, seconded by CounciImember Dehen, to direct staff to bring back a <br />recommendation to the Committee on a driveway paving program based on the above discussion. <br /> <br />Councilmember Dehen requested further information regarding the Coon Rapids incentive <br />program and the enforcement of the ordinance with the next discussion ofthe program. <br /> <br />Public Works Committee I April 17, 2007 <br />Page 16 of 18 <br />